Olfactive detection of fig wasps as prey by the ant Crematogaster scutellaris (Formicidae; Myrmicinae)

In the species-specific and obligate mutualism between the fig (Ficus carica) and its pollinator (the fig wasps Blastophaga psenes), a third participant, the ant Crematogaster scutellaris, is a predator of the wasps. Here, we ask how ant workers can rapidly localise such prey, whose availability is limited in time and space. Using a Y-tube olfactometer, we tested ant response to odours emitted by different types of figs (receptive female, ripe female or male figs) and by fig wasps (pollinators or non-pollinators). We demonstrate that ants were significantly attracted only to odours emitted by pollinators, either alone or associated with odours of male figs (releasing wasps). Detection of prey odour by ants is an important trait that can explain their observed high rate of predation on pollinators, and could have important implications on the stability of the fig/fig wasp mutualism.

[1]  J. Lachaud,et al.  Graded recruitment and hunting strategies linked to prey weight and size in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  T. Bourgoin,et al.  Ant species that protect figs against other ants: Result of territoriality induced by a mutualistic homopteran , 1997 .

[3]  R. Leuthold,et al.  The alarm behaviour from the mandibular gland secretion in the antCremastogaster scutellaris , 1973, Insectes Sociaux.

[4]  M. Hossaert-McKey,et al.  Interactions of the ant Crematogaster scutellaris with the fig/fig wasp mutualism , 2003 .

[5]  M. Hossaert-McKey,et al.  Volatile compounds from extracts of figs of Ficus carica , 1997 .

[6]  Michael D. Breed,et al.  Temporal learning in the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata , 1987 .

[7]  P. Gouyon,et al.  THE STABILITY OF THE SYMBIOSIS BETWEEN DIOECIOUS FIGS AND THEIR POLLINATORS: A STUDY OF FICUS CARICA L. AND BLASTOPHAGA PSENES L. , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  R H Leuthold Recruitment to Food in the Ant Crematogaster asmeadi , 1968 .

[9]  SITEMATE RECOGNITION : THE CASE OF ANOCHETUS TRAEGORDHI (HYMENOPTERA; FORMICIDAE) PREYING ON NASUTITERMES (ISOPTERA : TERMITIDAE) , 1999 .

[10]  C. Zachariades Complex interactions involving the Cape fig, Ficus sur Forsskål, and its associated insects , 1995 .

[11]  B. Schatz,et al.  BEHAVIORAL ADAPTATIONS OF AN AFRICAN PONERINE ANT IN THE CAPTURE OF MILLIPEDES , 2001 .

[12]  H. Robertson,et al.  Complex Interactions Between Mutualisms: Ants Tending Homopterans Protect Fig Seeds and Pollinators , 1988 .

[13]  J. Bronstein Predators of fig wasps , 1988 .

[14]  A. Dejean,et al.  INTENSIVE FOOD SEARCHING IN HUMID PATCHES: ADAPTATION OF A MYRMICINE ANT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS , 2001 .

[15]  W. J. Bell Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources , 1991 .

[16]  Prof. Dr. Eberhard Curio The Ethology of Predation , 1976, Zoophysiology and Ecology.

[17]  J. Traniello Foraging Strategies of Ants , 1989 .

[18]  M. Anstett,et al.  Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  M. Hossaert-McKey,et al.  Chemosensory attraction of fig wasps to substances produced by receptive figs , 1994 .

[20]  John R. B. Lighton,et al.  Energetics of Locomotion and Load Carriage and a Model of the Energy Cost of Foraging in the Leaf-Cutting Ant Atta colombica Guer , 1987, Physiological Zoology.

[21]  J. Lachaud,et al.  Spatio-temporal learning by the ant ectatomma ruidum , 1999, Journal of Experimental Biology.