Three-dimensional motion capture protocol for seated operator in whole body vibration

Abstract A new methodology to measure the response of seated people to whole body vibration (WBV) is presented in this work. The proposed methodology is based on using motion capture systems with reflective markers to detect the position versus time motion of selective landmarks on the human body during vibration while taking into consideration the seatback. The methodology also circumvented the problem of tracking the motion of the physical markers on the lower thoracic and lumbar areas of the spine, which cannot be seen by the cameras due to the existence of the seatback, by introducing virtual (calculated) markers that substitute for the physical markers. Additional (redundant) markers were attached to the segments of interest to generate local coordinate systems that can be used to obtain the trajectories of the virtual markers. Simulated ride files containing both complex vibration and mild impact signals were played back through a man-rated 6 d.f. motion platform. The methodology was tested on three seated subjects; there was considerable agreement between the trajectories of the physical and virtual markers. Error assessments also showed insignificant discrepancy between the physical and virtual markers. The proposed methodology showed encouraging results in WBV testing and may be useful for other applications where people perform tasks in a seated position. Relevance to industry People who operate heavy construction machinery can be at increased risk for low back pain and other musculoskeletal problems. WBV in combination with postural constraints is one potential underlying cause for these complaints. However, WBV is difficult to study without altering the typical operator environment as the seatback and armrests often limit the ability to monitor human motion, particularly the lumbar spine. The development of an efficient and effective technique for measuring three-dimensional (3D) displacement data of the lower back region of seated operators in realistic environments exposed to WBV, could advance the development and validation process of computer human modeling in this field. Preventing these problems can save people significant suffering and industry significant cost due to compensation, medical care, lost productivity, and retraining.

[1]  Chris Miller,et al.  A quasi-static method for determining the characteristics of a motion capture camera system in a "split-volume" configuration. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[2]  Neil J Mansfield,et al.  Impedance methods (apparent mass, driving point mechanical impedance and absorbed power) for assessment of the biomechanical response of the seated person to whole-body vibration. , 2005, Industrial health.

[3]  D E Gyi,et al.  The prevalence of musculoskeletal troubles among car drivers. , 2002, Occupational medicine.

[4]  A. King,et al.  Measurement of Angular Acceleration of a Rigid Body Using Linear Accelerometers , 1975 .

[5]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Effects of sitting postures on biodynamic response of seated occupants under vertical vibration , 2004 .

[6]  R W Soutas-Little,et al.  A method for computing the three-dimensional angular velocity and acceleration of a body segment from three-dimensional position data. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Naoki Suzuki,et al.  A novel system of four‐dimensional motion analysis after total hip arthroplasty , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  Effects of prolonged sitting on the passive flexion stiffness of the in vivo lumbar spine. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  K Manal,et al.  The accuracy of estimating proximal tibial translation during natural cadence walking: bone vs. skin mounted targets. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  Donald E. Wasserman,et al.  Hand-Arm Vibration: A Comprehensive Guide for Occupational Health Professionals , 1992 .

[11]  Siegfried Fischer,et al.  Vibration induced low back disorders--comparison of the vibration evaluation according to ISO 2631 with a force-related evaluation. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  On simulating human reach motions for ergonomics analyses , 2002 .

[13]  M J Griffin,et al.  Modelling the response of the spinal system to whole-body vibration and repeated shock. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  W C Hutton,et al.  The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  S. Rahmatalla,et al.  Displacement , Velocity , and Acceleration of Seated Operators in a Whole Body Vibration Environment using Optical Motion Capture Systems , 2006 .

[16]  D G Wilder,et al.  Epidemiological and aetiological aspects of low back pain in vibration environments - an update. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  David G. Wilder,et al.  Head-trunk motion increase with arm-rest controls , 2006 .

[19]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Salam Rahmatalla,et al.  A Framework to Study Human Response to Whole Body Vibration , 2007 .

[21]  Bilal Y. Maiteh An Application of Digital Human Modeling and Ergonomics Analysis in Workplace Design , 2003 .

[22]  J. Reft,et al.  Trajectories of target reaching arm movements in individuals with spinal cord injury: Effect of external trunk support , 2002, Spinal Cord.

[23]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Jinjun Xiong,et al.  Effects of Load and Speed on Lumbar Vertebral Kinematics during Lifting Motions , 2003, Hum. Factors.