Fully digital fabrication of an occlusal device using an intraoral scanner and 3D printing: A dental technique.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peter Rammelsberg | Moritz Waldecker | Michael Leckel | Wolfgang Bömicke | P. Rammelsberg | M. Waldecker | W. Bömicke | M. Leckel
[1] T. Grünheid,et al. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[2] Richard van Noort,et al. The future of dental devices is digital. , 2012 .
[3] M. Ash,et al. Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splint. , 1994, Journal of oral rehabilitation.
[4] C. Ko,et al. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[5] A. Vissink,et al. Full 3-dimensional digital workflow for multicomponent dental appliances: A proof of concept. , 2016, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[6] B. Chrcanovic,et al. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.
[7] E. Yuzbasioglu,et al. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes , 2014, BMC oral health.
[8] B. Wöstmann,et al. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.
[9] M. Cune,et al. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[10] Nawapat Sakornwimon,et al. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients’ preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[11] Yijin Ren,et al. Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: A comparative study in young patients. , 2016, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[12] F. Lobbezoo,et al. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials , 2018, Journal of oral rehabilitation.
[13] Mark Lauren,et al. A new computer-assisted method for design and fabrication of occlusal splints. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[14] H. Reijers,et al. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. , 2014, Clinical oral implants research.
[15] T. Attin,et al. Accuracy of Buccal Scan Procedures for the Registration of Habitual Intercuspation. , 2018, Operative dentistry.
[16] Joo-Hee Lee,et al. Wear Resistance of 3D Printing Resin Material Opposing Zirconia and Metal Antagonists , 2018, Materials.