Role of Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment in Learning to Write

Abstract The authors examined the impact of self-assessment on 7th- and 8th-grade students' written essays. Students wrote 2 essays: historical fiction essay and response to literature essay. All students received instructional rubrics that articulated the criteria and gradations of quality for the given essay. Students in the treatment group participated in 2 formal self-assessment lessons, during which they used the rubric to assess the quality of their drafts. Authors used multiple linear regression to examine the relationship between essay scores, treatment, and a set of control predictors. The results from the historical fiction essay suggested a positive relationship between the treatment and girls' scores, but no statistically significant relationship between the treatment and boys' scores. The results from the response to literature essay showed no effect of treatment for either boys or girls. The results are explained in terms of the insufficiency of the intervention, as well as the possible effects of rubrics, school conditions, and gender differences in response to self-generated feedback.

[1]  H. Andrade.  Student Self-Assessment: At the Intersection of Metacognition and Authentic Assessment. , 1999 .

[2]  S. Nolen-Hoeksema,et al.  Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback , 1989 .

[3]  H. Andrade.  The Effects of Instructional Rubrics on Learning to Write , 2001 .

[4]  William S. Davidson,et al.  Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: II. The Contingencies of Evaluative Feedback in the Classroom and III. An Experimental Analysis , 1978 .

[5]  John D. Hey,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[6]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Reaction to social pressure from adults versus peers among Soviet day school and boarding school pupils in the perspective of an American sample. , 1970 .

[7]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[8]  Charles R. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Writing: The Role of Teachers' Knowledge About Text, Learning, and Culture , 1998 .

[9]  Colette Daiute,et al.  Physical and Cognitive Factors in Revising: Insights from Studies with Computers. , 1986 .

[10]  H. Andrade.  Using Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning. , 2000 .

[11]  G. Wiggins.  Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. , 1989 .

[12]  Marjorie T. Davis,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Writing: Recent Advances in Understanding, Evaluating, and Improving Student Performance , 1988 .

[13]  E. Hollander,et al.  Parental determinants of peer-orientation and self-orientation among preadolescents. , 1970 .

[14]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1 , 1980 .

[15]  U. Bronfenbrenner.  Response to Pressure from Peers Vs Adults Among Soviet and American School Children , 1967 .

[16]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Changing assessments : alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction , 1994 .

[17]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: I. Differential Debilitation with Peer and Adult Evaluators. , 1976 .

[18]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[19]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Assessment in Context: The Alternative to Standardized Testing , 1992 .