Dose Schedule Optimization and the Pharmacokinetic Driver of Neutropenia

Toxicity often limits the utility of oncology drugs, and optimization of dose schedule represents one option for mitigation of this toxicity. Here we explore the schedule-dependency of neutropenia, a common dose-limiting toxicity. To this end, we analyze previously published mathematical models of neutropenia to identify a pharmacokinetic (PK) predictor of the neutrophil nadir, and confirm this PK predictor in an in vivo experimental system. Specifically, we find total AUC and Cmax are poor predictors of the neutrophil nadir, while a PK measure based on the moving average of the drug concentration correlates highly with neutropenia. Further, we confirm this PK parameter for its ability to predict neutropenia in vivo following treatment with different doses and schedules. This work represents an attempt at mechanistically deriving a fundamental understanding of the underlying pharmacokinetic drivers of neutropenia, and provides insights that can be leveraged in a translational setting during schedule selection.

[1]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics and metabolism of paclitaxel and its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships in humans. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Baruchel,et al.  Tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of a sunitinib powder formulation in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group study , 2012, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[3]  J. Bergh,et al.  Population analysis of the pharmacokinetics and the haematological toxicity of the fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen in breast cancer patients , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[4]  R. Obach,et al.  Phase I dose-finding study and a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of the neutropenic response of intravenous diflomotecan in patients with advanced malignant tumours , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[5]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Semiphysiological model for the time course of leukocytes after varying schedules of 5-fluorouracil in rats. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  A. C. Dubbelman,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and metabolites in a randomized comparative study in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer patients. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Vignetti,et al.  Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in combination with lower‐dose clofarabine as salvage therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: results of a phase II GIMEMA study (AML‐1107) , 2012, British journal of haematology.

[8]  Mats O Karlsson,et al.  Model of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression with parameter consistency across drugs. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. B. Walker,et al.  Effects on quality of life, anti-cancer responses, breast conserving surgery and survival with neoadjuvant docetaxel: a randomised study of sequential weekly versus three-weekly docetaxel following neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with primary breast cancer , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[10]  S. Duffull,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimisation of Carboplatin , 1997, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[11]  J. Wanders,et al.  Semi-physiological model describing the hematological toxicity of the anti-cancer agent indisulam , 2005, Investigational New Drugs.

[12]  G. Budd,et al.  Delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to women with early‐stage breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[13]  H. Saka,et al.  Pharmacological analysis of etoposide in elderly patients with lung cancer. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[14]  E. Endert,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of prednisolone-induced lymphocytopenia in man. , 1984, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[15]  T. Campbell,et al.  Comparison of weekly versus every 3 weeks paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced solid tumors: a meta-analysis. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[16]  J. Herndon,et al.  Schedule dependency of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in combination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  T. Kawamoto,et al.  TAK-960, a Novel, Orally Available, Selective Inhibitor of Polo-Like Kinase 1, Shows Broad-spectrum Preclinical Antitumor Activity in Multiple Dosing Regimens , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[18]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Relationships between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  T. Habermann,et al.  A phase II trial of the oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus in relapsed aggressive lymphoma , 2010, Leukemia.

[20]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Scaling the time-course of myelosuppression from rats to patients with a semi-physiological model , 2010, Investigational New Drugs.

[21]  Mats O Karlsson,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model for Neutropenia with Patient Subgroup Identification: Comparison across Anticancer Drugs , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  M. Karlsson,et al.  The pharmacokinetics of epirubicin and docetaxel in combination in rats , 1999, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[23]  J. Schellens,et al.  PK/PD Model of Indisulam and Capecitabine: Interaction Causes Excessive Myelosuppression , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[24]  G. Peters,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil assessed with a sensitive mass spectrometric method in patients on a dose escalation schedule. , 1988, Cancer research.

[25]  M. Egorin,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage reduction of cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum in patients with impaired renal function. , 1984, Cancer research.

[26]  J. Verweij,et al.  Mechanism‐based models for topotecan‐induced neutropenia , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[27]  J. Silber,et al.  First-cycle blood counts and subsequent neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay in early-stage breast cancer therapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  R. Straubinger,et al.  Paclitaxel pharmacodynamics: application of a mechanism‐based neutropenia model , 2001, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[29]  M O Karlsson,et al.  Population pharmacokinetic modelling of unbound and total plasma concentrations of paclitaxel in cancer patients. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[30]  L. Friberg,et al.  The shape of the myelosuppression time profile is related to the probability of developing neutropenic fever in patients with docetaxel-induced grade IV neutropenia , 2012, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[31]  Brigitte Tranchand,et al.  Contribution of modelling chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicity for clinical practice. , 2007, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[32]  R. Larsson,et al.  A general model for time‐dissociated pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationships exemplified by paclitaxel myelosuppression , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[33]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Clinical application of a semimechanistic-physiologic population PK/PD model for neutropenia following pemetrexed therapy , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[34]  M. Socinski Single-agent paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, The oncologist.

[35]  M. Milella,et al.  Weekly docetaxel as second line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2006, Cancer treatment reviews.

[36]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Limited inter-occasion variability in relation to inter-individual variability in chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression , 2010, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[37]  J. Bergh,et al.  Model describing the relationship between pharmacokinetics and hematologic toxicity of the epirubicin-docetaxel regimen in breast cancer patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Mats O Karlsson,et al.  Model-based neutrophil-guided dose adaptation in chemotherapy: evaluation of predicted outcome with different types and amounts of information. , 2010, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[39]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  B. Lin,et al.  Weekly paclitaxel improved pathologic response of primary chemotherapy compared with standard 3 weeks schedule in primary breast cancer , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[41]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of combined chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with ovarian cancer , 2001, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  O. S. Nielsen,et al.  A randomized study of epirubicin at four different dose levels in advanced breast cancer. Feasibility of myelotoxicity prediction through single blood-sample measurement , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[43]  M. Boiocchi,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Optimisation of Treatment with Oral Etoposide , 2004, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[44]  J B Vermorken,et al.  A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  Mats O Karlsson,et al.  A semimechanistic-physiologic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for neutropenia following pemetrexed therapy , 2006, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.