Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.

PURPOSE The aim of this trial was to assess if the nonremoval of abutments placed at the time of surgery would improve bone and gingival healing around single immediately restored implants placed in postextraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients received a single square-threaded tapered implant placed in postextraction sockets and immediately restored. All the implants were placed 2.0 mm below the bone crest, avoiding any contact with the coronal portion of the buccal wall. Six months after surgery, 35 patients were treated following the control standard prosthetic protocol: the abutments were removed and impressions were made directly on the implant platform. Thirty-three patients underwent the "one abutment at one time" test protocol: impressions were made of the abutments using snap-on abutment copies. The dimensional changes of the soft and hard tissues were assessed using digital photography and cone beam computed tomography radiographs immediately after surgery and at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up examinations. RESULTS All implants were osseointegrated and clinically stable at the follow-up examinations. No statistically significant difference was evidenced between the two groups regarding the measurement of vertical bone healing. After the placement of the final restoration, a significant horizontal loss in the hard tissue portion over the implant platform was assessed (p = .03 mesial sites; p = .04 distal sites). An 87% increase of the mean recession of the buccal soft tissue was observed in the control group (+0.27 mm) in the same time frame. CONCLUSIONS The nonremoval of abutments placed at the time of the surgery improves the stability of healed soft and hard tissues around the immediately restored, subcrestally placed tapered single maxillary implant.

[1]  W. Johnston,et al.  Effects of implant design and surface roughness on crestal bone and soft tissue levels in the esthetic zone. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  M. Cristalli,et al.  Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial. , 2010, European journal of oral implantology.

[3]  T. Traini,et al.  Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[4]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Buccal bone plate in immediately placed and restored implant with Bio-Oss(®) collagen graft: a 1-year follow-up study. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[5]  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  C. Hämmerle,et al.  Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  Marco Degidi,et al.  One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and its effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. , 2008, Clinical Oral Implants Research.

[10]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. , 2004, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  N. Lang,et al.  A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  G. Ramieri,et al.  Organization of the connective tissue barrier around long-term loaded implant abutments in man. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Predictors of inter-proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a multivariate analysis. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  M. Nagata,et al.  Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  J. Lozada,et al.  Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  M. Textor,et al.  Effects of surface topography on the connective tissue attachment to subcutaneous implants. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  Stefan Renvert,et al.  Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part I: implant loss and associations to various factors. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[22]  Lazzara Rj,et al.  Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. , 1989 .

[23]  J. Lindhe,et al.  The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Impact of abutment material and dis-/re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.