A low-cost system for coil tracking during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PURPOSE Accurate coil placement over a target area is critical during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as small deviations can alter testing outcomes. Accordingly, frameless stereotaxic systems (FSS) are recommended for reliable coil placement during TMS applications. However, FSS is not practical due to the cost associated with procuring such systems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a low-cost TMS coil tracking approach using simple webcams and an image processing algorithm in LabVIEW Vision Assistant. METHODS A system was created using two webcams, retroreflective markers, and computer stereovision, for tracking the TMS coil over a target area. Accuracy of the system was validated in both the global and local reference frames, while repeatability was measured within- and between-days for placement of the TMS coil over the target area relative to the head. The feasibility of our system was also verified by collecting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of first dorsal interosseous muscle from human subjects. RESULTS The results of this study indicated that the system was highly accurate and repeatable, and could track the coil position with <5 mm error and orientation <1.1° error from the target. We also observed larger and more consistent MEPs when stimulating the brain using feedback from the coil tracking system than when the examiner attempted to stimulate without any feedback. CONCLUSION The findings suggest that webcam-based coil tracking is a feasible low-cost solution to track coil positions during TMS procedures.

[1]  J. Ausman,et al.  Early angiographic changes after carotid endarterectomy. , 1982, Neurosurgery.

[2]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[3]  M. Crawford,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability of corticospinal volleys in human subjects. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Hallett Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Primer , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  Chandramouli Krishnan,et al.  A low cost real-time motion tracking approach using webcam technology. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. , 1994, Science.

[8]  E. Hollander,et al.  Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial , 2015, World Psychiatry.

[9]  S. A. Brandt,et al.  An initial transient-state and reliable measures of corticospinal excitability in TMS studies , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  L. Boyd,et al.  Changes in thresholds for intracortical excitability in chronic stroke: more than just altered intracortical inhibition. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[11]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Yeh,et al.  Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional premotor and primary motor cortices facilitate poststroke motor recovery. , 2014, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[13]  Robert Chen,et al.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  S. Brandt,et al.  A case of pathological excitability located with navigated-TMS: presurgical evaluation of focal neocortical epilepsy. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[15]  V. Lazzaro,et al.  Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  V. Seifert,et al.  Test-retest Reliability of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Simone Rossi,et al.  Optically tracked neuronavigation increases the stability of hand-held focal coil positioning: Evidence from “transcranial” magnetic stimulation-induced electrical field measurements , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  Sarah H. Lisanby,et al.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[19]  P. Mazzone,et al.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  A. Pelissolo,et al.  Transcranial Cortical Stimulation in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders: Efficacy Studies , 2015, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[21]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Thiel,et al.  Localizing Broca's area for transcranial magnetic stimulation: Comparison of surface distance measurements and stereotaxic positioning , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[24]  Arnaud Cachia,et al.  A triangulation-based magnetic resonance image-guided method for transcranial magnetic stimulation coil positioning , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Liang Qiao,et al.  TMS: A Tailored Method of Stimulation for Refractory Focal Epilepsy? , 2013, Epilepsy currents.

[26]  J. Krakauer,et al.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; Confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[28]  D. Newham,et al.  The Effect of Coil Type and Navigation on the Reliability of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  Cortical inhibition and excitation by bilateral transcranial alternating current stimulation. , 2015, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[30]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  Ipsilesional motor area size correlates with functional recovery after stroke: a 6-month follow-up longitudinal TMS motor mapping study. , 2015, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.