Channel head location and characteristics using digital elevation models

The drainage network is the conduit through which much surface water and sediment are routed within a catchment. In a catchment, the position of where hillslopes begin and channels end has long been considered the position of transition between diffusive processes upslope and the more incisive fluvial processes downslope. Consequently, understanding channel head location is an important issue in understanding catchment hydrology and geomorphology. This study examines channel head position and characteristics in a catchment in Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia. In this study the position of channel heads was mapped within the catchment and plotted on a reliable digital elevation model of the catchment. It was found that the majority of channel heads have relatively small source areas and that graphical catchment descriptors, such as the area–slope relationship and cumulative area distribution, can provide reliable measures of the field position of the heads of first‐order streams and the transition from hillslope to channel. The area–slope relationship and cumulative area distribution are also shown to be good tools for determining digital elevation model grid size which can capture hillslope detail and the transition from hillslope to channel. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Hancock.  The use of digital elevation models in the identification and characterization of catchments over different grid scales , 2005 .

[2]  G. D. Fontana,et al.  Slope–area relationships and sediment dynamics in two alpine streams , 2003 .

[3]  J. Poesen,et al.  Prediction of concentrated flow width in ephemeral gully channels , 2002 .

[4]  Kevin J. McMaster.  Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions , 2002 .

[5]  Greg Hancock,et al.  Testing of the SIBERIA landscape evolution model using the Tin Camp Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, field catchment , 2002 .

[6]  Katumi Musiake,et al.  Spatial resolution sensitivity of catchment geomorphologic properties and the effect on hydrological simulation , 2001 .

[7]  G. Hancock,et al.  Use of a landscape simulator in the validation of the SIBERIA Catchment Evolution Model: Declining equilibrium landforms , 2001 .

[8]  Jay C. Bell,et al.  Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling , 2001 .

[9]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Effects of Digital Elevation Model Accuracy on Hydrologic Predictions , 2000 .

[10]  J. Poesen,et al.  Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe , 2000 .

[11]  Jeroen M. Schoorl,et al.  Three-dimensional landscape process modelling : the effect of DEM resolution , 2000 .

[12]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Differences in topographic characteristics computed from 100- and 1000-m resolution digital elevation model data , 2000 .

[13]  Greg Hancock,et al.  Medium-term erosion simulation of an abandoned mine site using the SIBERIA landscape evolution model , 2000 .

[14]  J. Poesen,et al.  Importance of slope gradient and contributing area for optimal prediction of the initiation and trajectory of ephemeral gullies , 1999 .

[15]  N. Drake,et al.  Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution , 1999 .

[16]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology , 1999 .

[17]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  Scaling input data by GIS for hydrological modelling , 1999 .

[18]  D. Knighton.  Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .

[19]  G. Hancock,et al.  Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport‐limited catchment , 1998 .

[20]  G. Willgoose,et al.  A physical explanation of the cumulative area distribution curve , 1998 .

[21]  Marco Borga,et al.  USE OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL DATA FOR THE DERIVATION OF THE GEOMORPHOLOGICAL INSTANTANEOUS UNIT HYDROGRAPH , 1997 .

[22]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Predicting the Topographic Limits to a Gully Network Using a Digital Terrain Model and Process Thresholds , 1996 .

[23]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Flow resistance and sediment transport by concentrated overland flow in a grassland valley , 1995 .

[24]  Rafael L. Bras,et al.  The importance of spatially heterogeneous erosivity and the cumulative area distribution within a basin evolution model , 1995 .

[25]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  Effects of vertical resolution and map scale of digital elevation models on geomorphological parameters used in hydrology , 1995 .

[26]  K. Beven,et al.  The in(a/tan/β) index:how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework , 1995 .

[27]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[28]  John G. Fryer,et al.  On the accuracy of heighting from aerial photographs and maps: Implications to process modellers , 1994 .

[29]  D. Montgomery.  Road surface drainage, channel initiation, and slope instability , 1994 .

[30]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[31]  P. La Barbera,et al.  Invariance and scaling properties in the distributions of contributing area and energy in drainage basins , 1994 .

[32]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  A physical explanation for an observed area‐slope‐elevation relationship for catchments with declining relief , 1994 .

[33]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Channel network source representation using digital elevation models , 1993 .

[34]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  The Channel head , 1993 .

[35]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  A Physical Basis for Drainage Density , 1992 .

[36]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  Power law distributions of discharge mass and energy in river basins , 1992 .

[37]  Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe,et al.  A physical explanation of an observed link area‐slope relationship , 1991 .

[38]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 2. Nondimensionalization and applications , 1991 .

[39]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  A coupled channel network growth and hillslope evolution model: 1. Theory , 1991 .

[40]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Results from a new model of river basin evolution , 1991 .

[41]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[42]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[43]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[44]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  The analysis of river basins and channel networks using digital terrain data , 1989 .

[45]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Where do channels begin? , 1988, Nature.

[46]  S. Sloan.  A fast algorithm for constructing Delaunay triangulations in the plane , 1987 .

[47]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[48]  J. Dozier,et al.  Automated basin delineation from digital elevation data , 1984 .

[49]  V. Gupta,et al.  On the formulation of an analytical approach to hydrologic response and similarity at the basin scale , 1983 .

[50]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[51]  R. Story,et al.  Lands of the Alligator Rivers Area, Northern Territory , 1976 .

[52]  J. Flint.  Stream gradient as a function of order, magnitude, and discharge , 1974 .

[53]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .