Dangerous liaisons: the ecology of private interest and common good

Many ecological interactions that are called mutualistic are in fact mixtures of antagonistic and mutualistic aspects. For example, plasmids exploit their bacterial hosts but also protect them against external threats. In this study, we analyse the conditions for the evolution of what we call ‘dangerous liaisons’: interactions combining mutualistic and antagonistic aspects. Starting point of our analysis is a model that was proposed as early as 1934. In this model, partners have to form a complex (either temporary or long lasting) in order to interact. Using this model framework we then set out to define and tease apart private interests of the interacting partners from their common good. This dichotomy provides a unifying perspective to classify ecological interactions. We discuss some examples to illustrate how the outcome of the interaction may depend on densities or on other contextual variables. Finally, we note that having a common good is not a necessary condition for partners to have aligned interests. In a dangerous liaison partners may have interest to cooperate even when this does not bolster the common good.

[1]  R. Lewontin ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[2]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  The milker-killer dilemma in spatially structured predator-prey interactions , 1995 .

[3]  Georges b. Teissier,et al.  Symbiose, parasitisme et évolution : étude mathématique , 1934 .

[4]  R. Michod 4. Individuality, Immortality, and Sex , 2000 .

[5]  N. Yamamura,et al.  Evolution of mutualistic symbiosis without vertical transmission. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  Marina Omacini,et al.  Symbiotic fungal endophytes control insect host–parasite interaction webs , 2001, Nature.

[7]  D. Wilson Structured Demes and the Evolution of Group-Advantageous Traits , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[8]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[9]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Symbiosis through exploitation and the merger of lineages in evolution , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  S. Frank,et al.  Models of Symbiosis , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[12]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Selection of micro‐organisms in a spatially explicit environment and implications for plant access to nitrogen , 1998 .

[13]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[14]  Marcella J. Kelly,et al.  Tail-flagging and other antipredator signals in white-tailed deer: new data and synthesis , 1995 .

[15]  The evolution of mutualism and other forms of harmony at various levels of biological organization , 1995 .

[16]  N. Yamamura Vertical transmission and evolution of mutualism from parasitism , 1993 .

[17]  L. Hurst,et al.  Selfish genetic elements and their role in evolution: the evolution of sex and some of what that entails. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Lynn Margulis,et al.  The Colonization Hypothesis. (Book Reviews: Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. Evidence and Research Implications for a Theory of the Origin and Evolution of Microbial, Plant, and Animal Cells on the Precambrian Earth) , 1970 .

[19]  J. Heesterbeek,et al.  The saturating contact rate in marriage- and epidemic models , 1993, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  J. Bronstein Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  U. Mueller,et al.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  L. Bolis,et al.  Parasite-Host Associations : Coexistence or Conflict? , 1991 .

[23]  J. Takabayashi,et al.  Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. , 1996 .

[24]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[25]  E. Leigh,et al.  2. Levels of Selection, Potential Conflicts, and Their Resolution: The Role of the “Common Good” , 2000 .

[26]  J. H. Tumlinson,et al.  Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids , 1998, Nature.

[27]  M. Parker Mutualism in Metapopulations of Legumes and Rhizobia , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Why are organelles uniparentally inherited? , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  R. Dawkins The Extended Phenotype , 1982 .

[30]  R. Kurth,et al.  The viruses in all of us: characteristics and biological significance of human endogenous retrovirus sequences. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  S. Frank Kin selection and virulence in the evolution of protocells and parasites , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Han Olff,et al.  Herbivores Between Plants and Predators , 1999 .

[35]  T. Caro,et al.  Pursuit-deterrence revisited. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  D. E. Matthews Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[37]  J. Harris Placental endogenous retrovirus (ERV): structural, functional, and evolutionary significance , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[38]  R E Michod,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. II. Conflict mediation , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  J. Sapp Evolution by association : a history of symbiosis , 1994 .

[40]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[41]  M. A. Trump,et al.  The Dynamical Theory , 1999 .

[42]  J Desmyter,et al.  Different population dynamics of human T cell lymphotropic virus type II in intravenous drug users compared with endemically infected tribes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  L. Keller Levels of selection in evolution , 1999 .

[44]  J. Bronstein Our Current Understanding of Mutualism , 1994, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[45]  F. M. Stewart,et al.  The population biology of bacterial viruses: why be temperate. , 1984, Theoretical Population Biology.

[46]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  Models of Parasite Virulence , 1996, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[47]  W. Hamilton Extraordinary Sex Ratios , 1967 .