Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments.

The first generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments has successfully provided deeper understanding about how forests respond to an increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Located in aggrading stands in the temperate zone, they have provided a strong foundation for testing critical assumptions in terrestrial biosphere models that are being used to project future interactions between forest productivity and the atmosphere, despite the limited inference space of these experiments with regards to the range of global ecosystems. Now, a new generation of FACE experiments in mature forests in different biomes and over a wide range of climate space and biodiversity will significantly expand the inference space. These new experiments are: EucFACE in a mature Eucalyptus stand on highly weathered soil in subtropical Australia; AmazonFACE in a highly diverse, primary rainforest in Brazil; BIFoR-FACE in a 150-yr-old deciduous woodland stand in central England; and SwedFACE proposed in a hemiboreal, Pinus sylvestris stand in Sweden. We now have a unique opportunity to initiate a model-data interaction as an integral part of experimental design and to address a set of cross-site science questions on topics including responses of mature forests; interactions with temperature, water stress, and phosphorus limitation; and the influence of biodiversity.

[1]  B. Hungate,et al.  Cumulative response of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen stocks to chronic CO2 exposure in a subtropical oak woodland , 2013, The New phytologist.

[2]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Comprehensive ecosystem model‐data synthesis using multiple data sets at two temperate forest free‐air CO2 enrichment experiments: Model performance at ambient CO2 concentration , 2014 .

[3]  M. Lukac,et al.  Elevated atmospheric CO2 changes phosphorus fractions in soils under a short rotation poplar plantation (EuroFACE) , 2008 .

[4]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Hyperdominance in the Amazonian Tree Flora , 2013, Science.

[5]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Quantifying forest canopy traits: Imaging spectroscopy versus field survey , 2015 .

[6]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites , 2014, The New phytologist.

[7]  R. E. Dickson,et al.  Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests , 2014, Global change biology.

[8]  Anja Rammig,et al.  Leaf and stem economics spectra drive diversity of functional plant traits in a dynamic global vegetation model , 2015, Global change biology.

[9]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Terrestrial nitrogen feedbacks may accelerate future climate change , 2010 .

[10]  S. Scholz,et al.  Assessment of the Risk of Amazon Dieback , 2010 .

[11]  Colleen M. Iversen,et al.  Digging deeper: fine-root responses to rising atmospheric CO concentration in forested ecosystems. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[12]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Daniel S. Goll,et al.  Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling , 2012 .

[14]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[15]  Sönke Zaehle,et al.  Carbon–nitrogen interactions on land at global scales: current understanding in modelling climate biosphere feedbacks , 2011 .

[16]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests , 2008 .

[17]  S. Palmroth,et al.  Acclimation of leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long-term growth in elevated CO(2) (free-air CO(2) enrichment) and N-fertilization. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[18]  S. Zaehle,et al.  Does the growth response of woody plants to elevated CO2 increase with temperature? A model‐oriented meta‐analysis , 2015, Global change biology.

[19]  F. Bongers,et al.  No growth stimulation of tropical trees by 150 years of CO2 fertilization but water-use efficiency increased , 2015 .

[20]  Daniel M. Ricciuto,et al.  Predicting long‐term carbon sequestration in response to CO2 enrichment: How and why do current ecosystem models differ? , 2015 .

[21]  T. Tschaplinski,et al.  Plant water relations at elevated CO2 -- implications for water-limited environments. , 2002, Plant, cell & environment.

[22]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[23]  J. Moreno,et al.  Remote sensing of sun‐induced fluorescence to improve modeling of diurnal courses of gross primary production (GPP) , 2010 .

[24]  S. Heckathorn,et al.  A meta-analysis of plant physiological and growth responses to temperature and elevated CO2 , 2011, Oecologia.

[25]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks , 2014 .

[26]  R. Teskey.  Combined effects of elevated CO2 and air temperature on carbon assimilation of Pinus taeda trees , 1997 .

[27]  Ross E. McMurtrie,et al.  Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2 concentrations and temperatures , 1993 .

[28]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? , 2004 .

[29]  M. R. Shaw,et al.  Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 2004, Oecologia.

[30]  B. Medlyn,et al.  MAESPA: a model to study interactions between water limitation, environmental drivers and vegetation function at tree and stand levels, with an example application to [CO 2 ] × drought interactions , 2012 .

[31]  Jeffrey M. Warren,et al.  CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  P. Ciais,et al.  Modeled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and [CO2] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones , 2008 .

[33]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests , 2015, Global change biology.

[34]  R. Dewar,et al.  Plant root distributions and nitrogen uptake predicted by a hypothesis of optimal root foraging , 2012, Ecology and evolution.

[35]  S. Long,et al.  Review Tansley Review , 2022 .

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO₂. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[37]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing t , 2012 .

[38]  C. Gunderson,et al.  Thermal plasticity of photosynthesis: the role of acclimation in forest responses to a warming climate , 2009 .

[39]  A. Rogers,et al.  Comparison of gas use efficiency and treatment uniformity in a forest ecosystem exposed to elevated [CO2] using pure and prediluted free‐air CO2 enrichment technology , 2009 .

[40]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[41]  Arthur Gessler,et al.  Global climate change and tree nutrition: influence of water availability. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[42]  O. Rackham.  Ancient woodlands: modern threats. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[43]  C. Field,et al.  A model of biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus including symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphatase production , 2007 .

[44]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Faster Decomposition Under Increased Atmospheric CO2 Limits Soil Carbon Storage , 2014, Science.

[45]  S. Long,et al.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[46]  Donald R. Zak,et al.  Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments , 2011 .

[47]  R. Norby,et al.  Environmental and stomatal control of photosynthetic enhancement in the canopy of a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) plantation during 3 years of CO2 enrichment , 2002 .

[48]  H. Mooney,et al.  PREDICTING ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO ELEVATED CO2 CONCENTRATIONS , 1991 .

[49]  S. Palmroth,et al.  Increases in atmospheric CO2 have little influence on transpiration of a temperate forest canopy. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[50]  Mark West,et al.  C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland , 2011, Nature.

[51]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: Has its importance been underestimated? , 1991 .

[52]  M. Rossini,et al.  Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest , 2015 .

[53]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models , 2015 .

[54]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  R. Norby,et al.  Elevated CO₂ enhances leaf senescence during extreme drought in a temperate forest. , 2011, Tree physiology.

[56]  H. Hasenauer,et al.  Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO2 , 2011 .

[57]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites , 2013, Global change biology.

[58]  Y. Carrillo,et al.  Contrasting effects of elevated CO2 and warming on nitrogen cycling in a semiarid grassland. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[59]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  Future no‐analogue vegetation produced by no‐analogue combinations of temperature and insolation , 2014 .

[60]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[61]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest , 1999 .

[62]  M. Herold,et al.  Nondestructive estimates of above‐ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[63]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies , 2014, The New phytologist.

[64]  Rachel M. Law,et al.  A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere , 2009 .

[65]  R. Norby,et al.  Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi‐factor world , 2004 .

[66]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Tropical forest responses to increasing atmospheric CO2: current knowledge and opportunities for future research. , 2013, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[67]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth , 2015, Plant and Soil.

[68]  P. Newton,et al.  Seasonal not annual rainfall determines grassland biomass response to carbon dioxide , 2014, Nature.

[69]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The European carbon balance. Part 3: forests , 2010 .

[70]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[71]  P. Coffey,et al.  Emerging Market Instability : Do Sovereign Ratings Affect Country Risk and Stock Returns ? , 1997 .

[72]  W. Post,et al.  The role of phosphorus dynamics in tropical forests – a modeling study using CLM-CNP , 2013 .

[73]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Analysing Amazonian forest productivity using a new individual and trait-based model (TFS v.1) , 2014 .

[74]  P. H I L I P P E C I A I S Z, W O L F G A N G C R A M,et al.  Modeled interactive effects of precipitation , temperature , and [ CO 2 ] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones , 2008 .

[75]  Charles W. Cook,et al.  Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO(2) enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO(2)] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[76]  S. Levin,et al.  Competition for Water and Light in Closed-Canopy Forests: A Tractable Model of Carbon Allocation with Implications for Carbon Sinks , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[77]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe , 2013, Nature Communications.

[78]  W. Parton,et al.  Projected ecosystem impact of the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment experiment. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[79]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[80]  S. Linder,et al.  Growth of mature boreal Norway spruce was not affected by elevated [CO(2)] and/or air temperature unless nutrient availability was improved. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[81]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[82]  Burton E. Livingston,et al.  Plant Water Relations , 1927, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[83]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[84]  F. Dijkstra,et al.  Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature , 2012, Global change biology.

[85]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Increased water‐use efficiency during the 20th century did not translate into enhanced tree growth , 2011 .

[86]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Sustained enhancement of photosynthesis in mature deciduous forest trees after 8 years of free air CO2 enrichment , 2010, Planta.

[87]  Simon Scheiter,et al.  Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[88]  D. Schimel,et al.  Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[89]  M. Anand,et al.  Probing for the influence of atmospheric CO2 and climate change on forest ecosystems across biomes , 2013 .

[90]  S. Reed,et al.  Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[91]  B. Hungate,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF ELEVATED CO2 ON NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION IN A FIRE‐ADAPTED SCRUB OAK FOREST , 2003 .