The absence of a shape bias in children's word learning.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Luchins,et al. New Experimental Attempts at Preventing Mechanization in Problem Solving , 1950 .
[2] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[3] Ann L. Brown,et al. Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age ☆ , 1979 .
[4] E. Markman,et al. Developmental differences in the acquisition of basic and superordinate categories. , 1980 .
[5] R. Sternberg. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .
[6] C. Mervis,et al. Order of acquisition of subordinate-, basic-, and superordinate-level categories. , 1982 .
[7] E. Markman,et al. Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[8] E. Markman,et al. Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.
[9] C. Mervis. Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. , 1987 .
[10] E. Markman,et al. Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.
[11] Linda B. Smith,et al. The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .
[12] U. Neisser. Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .
[13] G. Murphy,et al. Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] Ellen M. Markman,et al. Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .
[15] E. Spelke,et al. Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.
[16] Count Nouns, Adjectives, and Perceptual Properties in Children's Novel Word Interpretations , 1992 .
[17] Linda B. Smith,et al. Syntactic context and the shape bias in children's and adults' lexical learning , 1992 .
[18] Dare A. Baldwin,et al. Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumption. , 1992, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[19] Linda B. Smith,et al. The place of perception in children's concepts ☆ , 1993 .
[20] Mutsumi Imai,et al. Children's Theories of Word Meaning: The Role of Shape Similarity in Early Acquisition , 1994 .
[21] Roberta Michnick Golinkoff,et al. Young Children Extend Novel Words at the Basic Level: Evidence for the Principle of Categorical Scope. , 1995 .
[22] Sandra R. Waxman,et al. Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] P. Zelazo,et al. An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them ☆ , 1996 .
[24] Susan A Gelman,et al. Shape and representational status in children's early naming , 1998, Cognition.
[25] W. Bruce Croft,et al. Why is a pomegranate an apple? The role of shape, taxonomic relatedness, and prior lexical knowledge in children's overextensions of apple and dog , 1996, Journal of Child Language.
[26] Lori Markson,et al. Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations , 1998 .
[27] J. Henderson,et al. High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[28] David M. Sobel,et al. Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. , 2000, Child development.
[29] Nell K. Duke,et al. Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. , 2000, Child development.
[30] Paul Bloom,et al. Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it , 2000, Cognition.
[31] Wayne D. Gray. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2001 .
[32] Y. Munakata,et al. All Together Now: When Dissociations Between Knowledge and Action Disappear , 2001, Psychological science.
[33] D. Gentner,et al. Language acquisition and conceptual development: Individuation, relativity, and early word learning , 2001 .
[34] Stephen C. Levinson,et al. Language acquisition and conceptual development: Relational concepts in form–function mapping , 2001 .
[35] S. Graham,et al. The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. , 2001, Child development.
[36] S. Waxman,et al. Word learning is ‘smart’: evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers' extension of novel words , 2002, Cognition.
[37] D. Amso,et al. Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response. , 2002, Developmental psychology.
[38] L. Markson,et al. Children's Reliance on Creator's Intent in Extending Names for Artifacts , 2003, Psychological science.
[39] P. Bloom,et al. How specific is the shape bias? , 2003, Child development.
[40] S. Gelman,et al. The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .