Elevated CO2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil
暂无分享,去创建一个
P. Reich | D. Ellsworth | B. Medlyn | M. Tjoelker | C. Macdonald | T. Gimeno | I. Anderson | K. Crous | J. Powell | J. Drake | J. Cooke | A. N. Gherlenda
[1] Peter M. Vitousek,et al. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF NUTRIENT LIMITATION OF FOREST GROWTH ON WET TROPICAL MOUNTAINS , 1998 .
[2] G. Katul,et al. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere , 2001, Nature.
[3] D. Ellsworth,et al. Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? , 2004 .
[4] W. Silver,et al. Some aspects of ecophysiological and biogeochemical responses of tropical forests to atmospheric change. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[5] R. Siegwolf,et al. Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO2 , 2005, Science.
[6] J. R. Evans,et al. Phosphorus status determines biomass response to elevated CO2 in a legume : C4 grass community , 2005 .
[7] R. Ceulemans,et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] R. B. Jackson,et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem processes under elevated CO2 in a warm-temperate forest. , 2006, Ecology.
[9] Johan Six,et al. Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis , 2006 .
[10] Helmut Hillebrand,et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.
[11] G. Bonan. Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.
[12] R. B. Jackson,et al. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.
[13] Daniel S. Goll,et al. Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling , 2012 .
[14] K.,et al. Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .
[15] P. Cox,et al. Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.
[16] M. Lomas,et al. Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.
[17] Stephen H. Roxburgh,et al. Development and testing of allometric equations for estimating above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings , 2013 .
[18] P. Reich,et al. Decade-long soil nitrogen constraint on the CO2 fertilization of plant biomass , 2013 .
[19] R. Matear,et al. Nitrogen and phosphorous limitations significantly reduce future allowable CO2 emissions , 2014 .
[20] D. Schimel,et al. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[21] Corinne Le Quéré,et al. Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets , 2014 .
[22] Pierre Friedlingstein,et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks , 2014 .
[23] S. Reed,et al. Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[24] D. Ellsworth,et al. Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth , 2015, Plant and Soil.
[25] M. Stitt,et al. Phosphorus nutrition in Proteaceae and beyond , 2015, Nature Plants.
[26] Ranga B. Myneni,et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2015 .
[27] Dali Guo,et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[28] Benjamin Smith,et al. Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO2 response of a nutrient‐ and water‐limited native Eucalypt woodland , 2016, Global change biology.
[29] D. Ellsworth,et al. Conserved stomatal behaviour under elevated CO2 and varying water availability in a mature woodland , 2016 .
[30] Alice Boit,et al. Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity , 2016 .
[31] P. Reich,et al. Short‐term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2016, Global change biology.
[32] D. Ellsworth,et al. Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric [CO2] but tracks water availability , 2016, Global change biology.
[33] S. Seneviratne,et al. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets , 2016, Nature.
[34] R. Duursma,et al. Boom and bust: rapid feedback responses between insect outbreak dynamics and canopy leaf area impacted by rainfall and CO2 , 2016, Global change biology.
[35] P. Xavier,et al. Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO 2 : a meta-analysis , 2022 .