Elevated CO2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil

Experimental evidence from a mature, phosphorous-limited, eucalypt forest finds that aboveground productivity was not significantly stimulated by elevated CO2. Findings suggest that this effect may be limited across much of the tropics. Rising atmospheric CO2 stimulates photosynthesis and productivity of forests, offsetting CO2 emissions1,2. Elevated CO2 experiments in temperate planted forests yielded ∼23% increases in productivity3 over the initial years. Whether similar CO2 stimulation occurs in mature evergreen broadleaved forests on low-phosphorus (P) soils is unknown, largely due to lack of experimental evidence4. This knowledge gap creates major uncertainties in future climate projections5,6 as a large part of the tropics is P-limited. Here, we increased atmospheric CO2 concentration in a mature broadleaved evergreen eucalypt forest for three years, in the first large-scale experiment on a P-limited site. We show that tree growth and other aboveground productivity components did not significantly increase in response to elevated CO2 in three years, despite a sustained 19% increase in leaf photosynthesis. Moreover, tree growth in ambient CO2 was strongly P-limited and increased by ∼35% with added phosphorus. The findings suggest that P availability may potentially constrain CO2-enhanced productivity in P-limited forests; hence, future atmospheric CO2 trajectories may be higher than predicted by some models. As a result, coupled climate–carbon models should incorporate both nitrogen and phosphorus limitations to vegetation productivity7 in estimating future carbon sinks.

[1]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF NUTRIENT LIMITATION OF FOREST GROWTH ON WET TROPICAL MOUNTAINS , 1998 .

[2]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere , 2001, Nature.

[3]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? , 2004 .

[4]  W. Silver,et al.  Some aspects of ecophysiological and biogeochemical responses of tropical forests to atmospheric change. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO2 , 2005, Science.

[6]  J. R. Evans,et al.  Phosphorus status determines biomass response to elevated CO2 in a legume : C4 grass community , 2005 .

[7]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem processes under elevated CO2 in a warm-temperate forest. , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  Johan Six,et al.  Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta‐analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[11]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[12]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[13]  Daniel S. Goll,et al.  Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling , 2012 .

[14]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[15]  P. Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.

[16]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[17]  Stephen H. Roxburgh,et al.  Development and testing of allometric equations for estimating above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings , 2013 .

[18]  P. Reich,et al.  Decade-long soil nitrogen constraint on the CO2 fertilization of plant biomass , 2013 .

[19]  R. Matear,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorous limitations significantly reduce future allowable CO2 emissions , 2014 .

[20]  D. Schimel,et al.  Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets , 2014 .

[22]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks , 2014 .

[23]  S. Reed,et al.  Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[24]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth , 2015, Plant and Soil.

[25]  M. Stitt,et al.  Phosphorus nutrition in Proteaceae and beyond , 2015, Nature Plants.

[26]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[27]  Dali Guo,et al.  Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[28]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO2 response of a nutrient‐ and water‐limited native Eucalypt woodland , 2016, Global change biology.

[29]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Conserved stomatal behaviour under elevated CO2 and varying water availability in a mature woodland , 2016 .

[30]  Alice Boit,et al.  Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity , 2016 .

[31]  P. Reich,et al.  Short‐term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2016, Global change biology.

[32]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric [CO2] but tracks water availability , 2016, Global change biology.

[33]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets , 2016, Nature.

[34]  R. Duursma,et al.  Boom and bust: rapid feedback responses between insect outbreak dynamics and canopy leaf area impacted by rainfall and CO2 , 2016, Global change biology.

[35]  P. Xavier,et al.  Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO 2 : a meta-analysis , 2022 .