Decoding of coherent but not incoherent motion signals in early dorsal visual cortex

When several scattered grating elements are arranged in such a way that their directions of motion are consistent with a common path, observers perceive them as belonging to a globally coherent moving object. Here we investigated how this coherence changes the representation of motion signals in human visual cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and multivariate voxel pattern decoding, which have the potential to reveal how well a stimulus is encoded in different contexts. Only during globally coherent motion was it possible to reliably distinguish fMRI signals evoked by different directions of motion in early visual cortex. This effect was specific to the retinotopic representation of the visual field quadrant in V1 traversed by the coherent element path and could not simply be attributed to a general increase in signal strength. Decoding was more reliable for cortical areas corresponding to the lower visual field. Because some previous studies observed poorer speed discrimination when motion was grouped, we also conducted behavioural experiments to investigate this with our stimuli, but did not reveal a consistent relationship between coherence and perceived speed. Taken together, these data show that neuronal populations in early visual cortex represent information that could be used for interpreting motion signals as unified objects.

[1]  Qi Zhu,et al.  The functional asymmetry of the lower and upper visual fields in attention and perceptual grouping , 2010 .

[2]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[4]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Motion grouping impairs speed discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[5]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Functional Organization for Direction of Motion and Its Relationship to Orientation Maps in Cat Area 18 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Mechanisms underlying decoding at 7 T: Ocular dominance columns, broad structures, and macroscopic blood vessels in V1 convey information on the stimulated eye , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Extra-classical receptive field effects measured in striate cortex with fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  Fang Fang,et al.  Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[10]  Hans P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Against hyperacuity in brain reading: Spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Adaptation to global structure induces spatially remote distortions of perceived orientation. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[12]  G. Orban,et al.  The kinetic occipital region in human visual cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Is cortical vasculature functionally organized? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Gang Chen,et al.  Motion processing in the ventral pathway: Evidence for direction maps in macaque V2 and V4 , 2010 .

[18]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  Jascha D. Swisher,et al.  Multiscale Pattern Analysis of Orientation-Selective Activity in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Hess,et al.  Modulation of V1 activity by shape: image-statistics or shape-based perception? , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[26]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Local Elements into Global Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[27]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  R. van Ee,et al.  Visual Cortex Allows Prediction of Perceptual States during Ambiguous Structure-From-Motion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Gilbert Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[31]  Aniruddha Das,et al.  Optical imaging of contextual interactions in V1 of the behaving monkey. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty , 1997, Vision Research.

[34]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Perceived visual speed constrained by image segmentation , 1996, Nature.

[36]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Inferring population responses in human visual cortex with classification analysis , 2010 .

[37]  D. Fitzpatrick Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  U Polat,et al.  Collinear interactions and contour integration. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[39]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  How does an fMRI voxel sample the neuronal activity pattern: Compact-kernel or complex spatiotemporal filter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Rees,et al.  Fine-scale activity patterns in high-level visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[41]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[43]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[44]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Enhanced Perception of Illusory Contours in the Lower Versus Upper Visual Hemifields , 1996, Science.

[45]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[47]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Primary visual cortex activation on the path of apparent motion is mediated by feedback from hMT+/V5 , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  B. Julesz,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes , 1994, Nature.

[49]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Flexible learning of natural statistics in the human brain. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[52]  Robert Turner,et al.  Image Distortion Correction in fMRI: A Quantitative Evaluation , 2002, NeuroImage.