Audit of a multidisciplinary approach to the care of children with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Cleft lip and palate affects the child in many ways, particularly appearance, dental arch relationships, growth of the face, and speech development. The key to successful care is management in a multidisciplinary team adhering to a well-designed protocol, and careful audit of results. We present the intermediate outcome audit of 15 patients with complete bilateral and unilateral cleft lip and palate whose condition was managed in a multidisciplinary team according to a strict protocol. We give the results observations of operations of a single surgeon's functional primary surgery over a 6-year period in terms of dental arch relationships, cephalometric analyses, aesthetic assessments, and speech analysis. The results show good early facial growth, with dental arch relationships appropriate for the age and group; we found only minor speech discrepancies, with no patients requiring pharyngoplasty. The results show the importance of multidisciplinary management, the value of keeping to sound surgical protocols, and functional techniques in cleft lip and palate surgery. Our study includes the neglected group of children who have bilateral cleft lip and palate, and it conforms to the style of pan-European projects.

[1]  B. Shaw,et al.  How relevant is the evidence-based process to orthodontics , 2000, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[2]  C. Evans.  Index may show outcome differences in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at 5-years of age , 1999, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[3]  M J Trenouth,et al.  Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study. , 1999, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  P. Devani,et al.  Speech outcome in children with cleft palate: aerophonoscope assessment of nasal emission. , 1996, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[5]  U. Joos,et al.  Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. Functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. , 1998, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  G. Semb,et al.  Early detection of differences in surgical outcome for cleft lip and palate. , 1998, British journal of orthodontics.

[7]  J. Sandy,et al.  Study models of 5 year old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  A. Markus,et al.  Mid-facial growth following functional cleft surgery. , 1997, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  A. Markus,et al.  Effect of primary surgery for cleft lip and palate on mid-facial growth. , 1997, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  O. Pospisil,et al.  Nasal symmetry after primary cleft lip repair: comparison between Delaire cheilorhinoplasty and modified rotation-advancement. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  U. Joos.  Skeletal growth after muscular reconstruction for cleft lip, alveolus and palate. , 1995, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  Ross Rb.  Growth of the facial skeleton following the Malek repair for unilateral cleft lip and palate. , 1995 .

[13]  R. Brusati,et al.  Repair of the cleft palate without lateral release incisions: results concerning 124 cases. , 1994, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  J Delaire,et al.  Functional primary closure of cleft lip. , 1993, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  R. B. Ross.  My friend the cranial base: why is it so normal? , 1993, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal.

[16]  J. Delaire,et al.  Primary closure of cleft palate: a functional approach. , 1993, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  J. Delaire,et al.  Clinical observations of cleft lip and palate. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[18]  C. Stephens,et al.  The ranking of facial attractiveness. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  W. Shaw,et al.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[20]  R. Brusati,et al.  The early gingivoalveoloplasty. Preliminary results. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[21]  W. Shaw,et al.  Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  Ross Rb.  Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. , 1987 .

[23]  U. Joos.  The importance of muscular reconstruction in the treatment of cleft lip and palate. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[24]  J. Delaire,et al.  Avoidance of the use of vomerine mucosa in primary surgical management of velopalatine clefts. , 1985, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[25]  W C Shaw,et al.  The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[26]  J Delaire,et al.  An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: a new lateral cephalometric analysis. , 1981, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[27]  Robert M. Ricketts,et al.  A foundation for cephalometric communication , 1960 .