Improving the quality of combined EEG-TMS neural recordings: Introducing the coil spacer

BACKGROUND In the last decade, interest in combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) approaches has grown substantially. Aside from the obvious artifacts induced by the magnetic pulses themselves, separate and more sinister signal disturbances arise as a result of contact between the TMS coil and EEG electrodes. NEW METHOD Here we profile the characteristics of these artifacts and introduce a simple device - the coil spacer - to provide a platform allowing physical separation between the coil and electrodes during stimulation. RESULTS EEG data revealed high amplitude signal disturbances when the TMS coil was in direct contact with the EEG electrodes, well within the physiological range of viable EEG signals. The largest artifacts were located in the Delta and Theta frequency range, and standard data cleanup using independent components analysis (ICA) was ineffective due to the artifact's similarity to real brain oscillations. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD While the current best practice is to use a large coil holding apparatus to fixate the coil 'hovering' over the head with an air gap, the spacer provides a simpler solution that ensures this distance is kept constant throughout testing. CONCLUSIONS The results strongly suggest that data collected from combined TMS-EEG studies with the coil in direct contact with the EEG cap are polluted with low frequency artifacts that are indiscernible from physiological brain signals. The coil spacer provides a cheap and simple solution to this problem and is recommended for use in future simultaneous TMS-EEG recordings.

[1]  T. Paus,et al.  Synchronization of neuronal activity in the human primary motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation: an EEG study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  G. Tononi,et al.  Breakdown of Cortical Effective Connectivity During Sleep , 2005, Science.

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A Review of Combined TMS-EEG Studies to Characterize Lasting Effects of Repetitive TMS and Assess Their Usefulness in Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[4]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Short-Latency Artifacts Associated with Concurrent TMS–EEG , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[5]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG Offers New Prospects in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[8]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  TMS-EEG co-registration: On TMS-induced artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Karhu,et al.  Efficient reduction of stimulus artefact in TMS–EEG by epithelial short-circuiting by mini-punctures , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Methodology for Combined TMS and EEG , 2009, Brain Topography.

[12]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on TMS–EEG Muscle Artifacts , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[13]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Human brain connectivity during single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.