Robotic Invention: Challenges and Perspectives for Model-Free Design Optimization of Dynamic Locomotion Robots

To improve a robot’s performance at a given task, or to respond to changing requirements, shape adaptation can be beneficial. To efficiently explore complex behaviors, diverse morphologies must be generated and implemented. For continuous and autonomous design optimization, the robot has furthermore to be able to assess its own performance and in turn generate and implement adapted morphological designs. Here, we present the morphological adaptation of physical robotic agents to a locomotion task. The robots are automatically assembled by a robotic manipulator from elementary modules and the assembly process of each agent is encoded in a genotype. The genotypes of a robot population are optimized using an evolutionary algorithm based on real-world performance feedback. In the experiments, 500 genotypes were evaluated. To develop rich behavioral diversity, shape variations are beneficial. Analysis of the results highlights the influence of the fabrication constraints on shape diversity, which impose limitations especially for larger structures.

[1]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  The Measurement of Species Diversity , 1974 .

[2]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Roombots: A hardware perspective on 3D self-reconfiguration and locomotion with a homogeneous modular robot , 2014, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  A robotic ecosystem with evolvable minds and bodies , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Evolvable Systems.

[4]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot Systems [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  An extendible reconfigurable robot based on hot melt adhesives , 2015, Auton. Robots.

[6]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[7]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Active Sensing System with In Situ Adjustable Sensor Morphology , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Mark Yim,et al.  Structure synthesis on-the-fly in a modular robot , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  F. Iida,et al.  Morphological Evolution of Physical Robots through Model-Free Phenotype Development , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  P. Eggenberger,et al.  Evolving the morphology of a compound eye on a robot , 1999, 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot'99). Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX355).

[11]  John Rieffel,et al.  Automatically Designing and Printing 3-D Objects with EvoFab 0.2 , 2012, ALIFE.

[12]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Assessing randomness and complexity in human motion trajectories through analysis of symbolic sequences , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Satoshi Murata,et al.  Distributed Self-Reconfiguration of M-TRAN III Modular Robotic System , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Jonas Neubert,et al.  Soldercubes: a self-soldering self-reconfiguring modular robot system , 2016, Auton. Robots.

[15]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Mechanics and energetics in tool manufacture and use: a synthetic approach , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Physical Connection and Disconnection Control Based on Hot Melt Adhesives , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.