Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: a qualitative model of influential factors

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a modified model for collaboration in BIM-based construction networks (BbCNs). Though BIM is increasingly adopted and implemented across the construction industry, the problems associated with the lack of collaboration among teams in BbCNs remain a major hindrance to reaping the full potential of BIM. Previous studies have been conceptual in nature. This paper, therefore, attempts to modify and validate existing conceptual models that describe collaboration in BbCNs.Design/methodology/approachTo modify the conceptual model for collaboration in BbCNs, qualitative data through semi-structured interviews with BIM experts in the industry were collected and analysed using qualitative methods including the use of NVivo software.FindingsThe proposed model includes influential factors and their sub-factors to collaboration in BbCNs, as well as considering their indicators. Findings reveal that several overlooked concepts, particularly unfavourable BIM contractual arrangements, act as the root causes of the unwillingness of team members in BbCNs to engage in collaborative efforts.Research limitations/implicationsThe study's findings must be viewed in light of several limitations. First, the interviewees in this study were based in Australia hence their perceptions of BIM collaboration are reflective of the sociotechnical setting of BIM-enabled projects in this country. Also, the findings are based on the perception of experts in the field, rather than analysis of performance measures or quantitative assessment of associations among collaboration outcomes and various factors. This, however, provides the field with fertile grounds for future research.Practical implicationsThe study benefits researchers by shifting the collaboration discourse in BIM-enabled projects from technology-related issues to the people and contractual-related domains. Moreover, the developed qualitative model provides industry professionals with a point of reference to improve collaboration on BIM-enabled projects.Social implicationsThe study benefits researchers by shifting the collaboration discourse in BIM-enabled projects from technology-related issues to the people and contractual-related domains. Moreover, the developed qualitative model provides industry professionals with a point of reference to improve collaboration on BIM-enabled projects.Originality/valueArguments provided in this study highlight the necessity of considering the contractual arrangement of BIM-related projects and foster the willingness of team members to collaborate. This can be addressed using clear and comprehensive BIM execution plans and clearly explaining the role of BIM managers in the process.

[1]  B. Raphael,et al.  Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks , 2021, BIM Teaching and Learning Handbook.

[2]  Sepehr Abrishami,et al.  Integrated project delivery with blockchain: An automated financial system , 2020, Automation in Construction.

[3]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Blockchain-oriented dynamic modelling of smart contract design and execution in the supply chain , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[4]  Xiaochun Luo,et al.  Modeling Dynamics of Project-Based Collaborative Networks for BIM Implementation in the Construction Industry: Empirical Study in Hong Kong , 2019 .

[5]  Faris Elghaish,et al.  Integrated project delivery with BIM: An automated EVM-based approach , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[6]  H. Alaka,et al.  Building Information Modelling adoption in the European Union: An overview , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[7]  Daniel W.M. Chan,et al.  Perceived benefits of and barriers to Building Information Modelling (BIM) implementation in construction: The case of Hong Kong , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[8]  Ruoyu Jin,et al.  Facilitating Building Information Modelling (BIM) using Integrated Project Delivery (IPD): A UK perspective , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[9]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Collaboration barriers in BIM-based construction networks: A conceptual model , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[10]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): a quantified model for Malaysia , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[11]  Salam Al-Bizri,et al.  Building information modeling for facilities management: A literature review and future research directions , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[12]  Louis Rivest,et al.  Analyzing BIM topics and clusters through ten years of scientific publications , 2019, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[13]  E Papadonikolaki,et al.  Organising and Managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[14]  Mohamad Syazli Fathi,et al.  Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: a systematic review , 2018, Built Environment Project and Asset Management.

[15]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Collaborative Role of Sociotechnical Components in BIM-Based Construction Networks in Two Hospitals , 2018, Journal of Management in Engineering.

[16]  Longhui Liao,et al.  Organizational Change Perspective on People Management in BIM Implementation in Building Projects , 2018 .

[17]  Urs Magnus Strewe,et al.  Discussion—How Does the Full Potential of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Finance Look Like? , 2018 .

[18]  David Arditi,et al.  Adoption of BIM in architectural design firms , 2017 .

[19]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: A bibliometric-qualitative literature review , 2017 .

[20]  Liu Qiang,et al.  A multi-server information-sharing environment for cross-party collaboration on a private cloud , 2017 .

[21]  Lin Yang,et al.  Empirical Study of BIM Implementation–Based Perceptions among Chinese Practitioners , 2017 .

[22]  Chirag Garg Review on detailed analysis of building information modelling process (BIM) and implementation based on a case study , 2017 .

[23]  Daniel Forgues,et al.  Understanding the impact of BIM on collaboration: a Canadian case study , 2017 .

[24]  Marcel Hertogh,et al.  Understanding effects of BIM on collaborative design and construction: An empirical study in China , 2017 .

[25]  Christoph Merschbrock,et al.  Where the Gaps Lie: Ten Years of Research into Collaboration on BIM-Enabled Construction Projects , 2017 .

[26]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Factors for effective BIM governance , 2017 .

[27]  Žiga Turk,et al.  Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management , 2017 .

[28]  Brian Bowe,et al.  BIM+Blockchain: A Solution to the Trust Problem in Collaboration? , 2017 .

[29]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Requirements for cloud-based BIM governance solutions to facilitate team collaboration in construction projects , 2016, Requirements Engineering.

[30]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Factors affecting perceived level of virtuality in hybrid construction project teams (HCPTs): a qualitative study , 2016 .

[31]  Heng Li,et al.  Linking the Motivations and Practices of Design Organizations to Implement Building Information Modeling in Construction Projects: Empirical Study in China , 2016 .

[32]  Daniel Forgues,et al.  Collaboration through innovation: implications for expertise in the AEC sector , 2016 .

[33]  Heng-Wei Wang,et al.  Improving interoperability between architectural and structural design models: An industry foundation classes-based approach with web-based tools , 2016 .

[34]  Mehrdad Arashpour,et al.  Enhancing collaboration in BIM-based construction networks through organisational discontinuity theory: a case study of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital , 2016 .

[35]  Ahmed,et al.  Research methodology in the built environment : a selection of case studies , 2016 .

[36]  Dominik Holzer The BIM Manager's Handbook: Guidance for Professionals in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2015 .

[37]  Christoph Merschbrock,et al.  Effective digital collaboration in the construction industry - A case study of BIM deployment in a hospital construction project , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[38]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Sociotechnical Systems Approach to BIM Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Construction Context , 2015 .

[39]  Julie S. Zide,et al.  LinkedIn and recruitment: how profiles differ across occupations , 2014 .

[40]  Nashwan Dawood,et al.  Building information modelling: protocols for collaborative design processes , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[41]  Terrence Fernando,et al.  Can virtual workspaces enhance team communication and collaboration in design review meetings? , 2014 .

[42]  Christoph Merschbrock,et al.  How is Building Information Modeling Influenced by Project Complexity?: A Cross-Case Analysis of e-Collaboration Performance in Building Construction , 2014, Int. J. e Collab..

[43]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Mutual awareness in collaborative design: An Augmented Reality integrated telepresence system , 2014, Comput. Ind..

[44]  O. Robinson Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide , 2014 .

[45]  Dominik Holzer,et al.  Rethinking the contractual context for Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Australian built environment industry , 2013 .

[46]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[47]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Building Information Modeling Education for Construction Engineering and Management. I: Industry Requirements, State of the Art, and Gap Analysis , 2013 .

[48]  Thayaparan Gajendran,et al.  Internationalisation of construction business and E-commerce: innovation, integration and dynamic capabilities , 2013 .

[49]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies , 2013 .

[50]  Adolfo Steiger-Garção,et al.  Construction collaborative networks: the case study of a building information modelling-based office building project , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[51]  Trefor P. Williams,et al.  Differing perspectives on collaboration in construction , 2012 .

[52]  Vedat G. Diker,et al.  The disconfirmatory interview as a strategy for the assessment of system dynamics models , 2012 .

[53]  J. Rowley Conducting research interviews , 2012 .

[54]  Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves,et al.  Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments , 2010 .

[55]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[56]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[57]  G. Andrews,et al.  Mja Guidelines for Assessing Qualitative Research Quality in Qualitative Research Criteria for Authors and Assessors in the Submission and Assessment of Qualitative Research Articles for the Medical Journal of Australia , 2022 .

[58]  H. Ashcraft Building Information Modeling : A Framework for Collaboration , 2008 .

[59]  Laura J. Black,et al.  Collaborating across boundaries : theoretical, empirical, and simulated explorations , 2002 .

[60]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Choosing an appropriate research methodology , 1997 .

[61]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .