Threshold Concepts in Chemistry: The Critical Role of Implicit Schemas

Threshold concepts are conceived as cognitive portals to new and previously inaccessible ways of thinking in a domain. They are transformative, integrative, irreversible, and troublesome concepts that open the door to highly productive ways of thinking in a discipline. Mastering threshold concepts in chemistry demands the construction of diverse cognitive elements, including implicit schemas that guide and constrain how students think about chemical substances and processes. The central goal of this paper is to highlight five critical shifts in students’ implicit schemas that should be fostered to support mastery of major threshold concepts in chemistry.

[1]  J. A. Pozo,et al.  Las ideas de los alumnos sobre la ciencia : una interpretación desde la psicología cognitiva , 1991 .

[2]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[3]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[4]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  How Do Students Reason About Chemical Substances and Reactions , 2013 .

[5]  Kristen L. Murphy,et al.  The ACS Exams Institute Undergraduate Chemistry Anchoring Concepts Content Map I: General Chemistry , 2017 .

[6]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Exploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students , 2010 .

[7]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking , 2014 .

[9]  Vicente Talanquer,et al.  On Cognitive Constraints and Learning Progressions: The case of “structure of matter” , 2009 .

[10]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Let’s teach how we think instead of what we know , 2010 .

[11]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  A Common Core to Chemical Conceptions: Learners’ Conceptions of Chemical Stability, Change and Bonding , 2013 .

[12]  S. Vosniadou.  The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change , 2009 .

[13]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Inventing a “Mid Level” to Make Ends Meet: Reasoning between the Levels of Complexity , 2008 .

[14]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  David Green,et al.  Identification of Threshold Concepts for Biochemistry , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  Jennifer Loertscher,et al.  Threshold concepts in biochemistry , 2011, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[17]  K. Taber,et al.  LEARNERS’ EXPLANATIONS FOR CHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 2000 .

[18]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Learning Processes in Chemistry: Drawing Upon Cognitive Resources to Learn About the Particulate Structure of Matter , 2010 .

[19]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions , 2006 .

[20]  Janice Smith,et al.  Threshold concepts within the disciplines , 2008 .

[21]  V. Talanquer.  When Atoms Want. , 2013 .

[22]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Making predictions about chemical reactivity: Assumptions and heuristics , 2013 .

[23]  Tina A. Grotzer.  Learning to Understand the Forms of Causality Implicit in Scientifically Accepted Explanations , 2003 .

[24]  P. Davies,et al.  Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics , 2007 .

[25]  D. Perkins.  Constructivism and troublesome knowledge , 2006 .

[26]  Ray Land,et al.  Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge , 2013 .

[27]  W. Meggers,et al.  Structure of Matter , 1965 .

[28]  H. King.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge , 2006 .

[29]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[30]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  The significance of implicit knowledge for learning and teaching chemistry , 2014 .

[32]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[33]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[34]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Beyond the Centralized Mindset , 1996 .

[35]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  Exploring Opportunities for Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms , 2012 .

[36]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Students' predictions about the sensory properties of chemical compounds: Additive versus emergent frameworks , 2008 .

[37]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[38]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education , 1998 .

[39]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[40]  Pier Luigi Luisi,et al.  Emergence in Chemistry: Chemistry as the Embodiment of Emergence , 2002 .

[41]  Amy R. Hofer,et al.  Threshold Concepts and Information Literacy , 2011 .

[42]  M. Nakhleh.  Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions , 1992 .

[43]  Charlotte E. Taylor,et al.  Threshold Concepts: Challenging the Way We Think, Teach and Learn in Biology and Science , 2010 .

[44]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Chemistry in the Field and Chemistry in the Classroom: A Cognitive Disconnect? , 2006 .