Evolution of cognitive trust in distributed software development teams: a punctuated equilibrium model

A significant body of literature has addressed trust in distributed teams. However, several important issues such as 1) trust in distributed software development teams, 2) the evolution of cognitive trust, and 3) the role of communication media in trust development have not been adequately addressed. The objective of this paper is to address the void discussed above by conducting a longitudinal study to examine the evolution of cognitive trust among distributed software development teams from USA and Norway or Switzerland. The results suggest that cognitive trust develops in accordance with the tenets of the Punctuated Equilibrium Model (PEM). Additionally, our study also suggests that different factors are important for trust building during the different stages of a software development project. The findings contribute to the body of trust research and to practice by identifying stages in a software development project during which managerial intervention can help elevate trust levels.

[1]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Some political and cultural issues in the globalisation of software development: case experience from Britain and India , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Rafael Prikladnicki,et al.  Global software development in practice lessons learned , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[4]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Innovation in working groups. , 1990 .

[5]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Missing links: building critical social ties for global collaborative teamwork , 2008, CACM.

[7]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[11]  K Veit,et al.  The reluctant entrepreneur. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[12]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Relationships between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and between Organizations , 1992 .

[13]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  S. Seashore.  Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[16]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? , 1979 .

[17]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Developing trust in virtual teams , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[21]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[22]  J. E. Nash,et al.  Social Processes and Relationships: A Formal Approach. , 1990 .

[23]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[24]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Impact of User Satisfaction and Trust on Virtual Team Members , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[25]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..

[26]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[29]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[30]  Devon S. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships , 2005 .

[31]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[32]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[33]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[34]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[36]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[37]  T. Kline.  Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation , 2005 .

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  E. Carmel,et al.  Offshoring Information Technology: Sourcing and Outsourcing to a Global Workforce , 2005 .

[40]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[41]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Tactical Approaches for Alleviating Distance in Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[43]  J. Driscoll.  Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction , 2011 .

[44]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[45]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[46]  M. West.  Innovation and creativity at work , 1997 .

[47]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[48]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[49]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[50]  Rafael Prikladnicki,et al.  Comparing Offshore Outsourcing and the Internal Offshoring of Software Development: A Qualitative Study , 2009, AMCIS.

[51]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[52]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management. , 1987 .

[53]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[54]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[55]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors. , 1984 .

[56]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[57]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[58]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium and Linear Progression: Toward a New Understanding of Group Development , 2003 .

[59]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[60]  Peggy M. Beranek,et al.  A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication: How Much Training is Enough? , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[61]  B. Aubert,et al.  Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[62]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[63]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[64]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[66]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[67]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .