Image Decomposition and Representation in Large Image Database Systems

To an increasing extent, applications demand the capability of retrieval based on image content. As a result, large image database systems need to be built to support effective and efficient accesses to image data on the basis of content. In this process, significant features must first be extracted from image data in their pixel format. These features must then be classified and indexed to assist efficient retrieval of image content. However, the issues central to automatic extraction and indexing of image content remain largely an open problem. Tools are not currently available with which to accurately specify image content for image database uses. In this paper, we investigate effective block-oriented image decomposition structures to be used as the representation of images in image database systems. Three types of block-oriented image decomposition structures, namely, quad-, quin-, and nona-trees, are compared. In analyzing and comparing these structures, wavelet transforms are used to extract image content features. Our experimental analysis illustrates that nona-tree decomposition is the most effective of the three decomposition structures available to facilitate effective content-based image retrieval. Using nona-tree structure to represent image content in an image database, various types of content-based queries and efficient image retrieval can be supported through novel indexing and searching approaches. We demonstrate that the nona-tree structure provides a highly effective approach to supporting automatic organization of images in large image database systems.

[1]  Phil Brodatz,et al.  Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers , 1966 .

[2]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks , 1996 .

[3]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  The R*-tree: an efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles , 1990, SIGMOD '90.

[4]  Jian-Kang Wu,et al.  Identifying faces using multiple retrievals , 1994, IEEE MultiMedia.

[5]  Raj S. Acharya,et al.  Approach to query-by-texture in image database systems , 1995, Other Conferences.

[6]  Arun K. Sood,et al.  Selecting image subbands for browsing scientific image databases , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Ramez Elmasri,et al.  Fundamentals of Database Systems , 1989 .

[8]  Dragutin Petkovic,et al.  Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System , 1995, Computer.

[9]  S. Mallat Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L^2(R) , 1989 .

[10]  Shi-Kuo Chang,et al.  Principles of pictorial information systems design , 1988 .

[11]  Shi-Kuo Chang,et al.  An Intelligent Image Database System , 1988, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[12]  Nick Roussopoulos,et al.  Faloutsos: "the r+- tree: a dynamic index for multidimensional objects , 1987 .

[13]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  A Visual Information Management System for the Interactive Retrieval of Faces , 1993, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[15]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Quad-tree segmentation for texture-based image query , 1994, MULTIMEDIA '94.

[16]  Aidong Zhang,et al.  Block-oriented image decomposition and retrieval in image database systems , 1996, Proceedings of International Workshop on Multimedia Database Management Systems.

[17]  T.-Y. Hou,et al.  Medical image retrieval by spatial features , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  The R+-Tree: A Dynamic Index for Multi-Dimensional Objects , 1987, VLDB.

[19]  Pasquale Savino,et al.  Automatic image Indexation and retrieval , 1991, RIAO.

[20]  Antonio Turtur,et al.  IDB: An image database system , 1991, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[21]  Hideyuki Tamura,et al.  Textural Features Corresponding to Visual Perception , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.