Risk factors for delayed milk ejection in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times per day: A case control study.

Delayed milk ejection, manifested most often as bimodal milk flow, occurs when the cisternal milk fraction is removed before the alveolar milk reaches the gland cistern. It is thought to be a consequence of not meeting cows' physiological needs, due to insufficient premilking teat stimulation, inadequate timing of milking unit attachment, or both. It has been associated with decreased milking efficiency, reduced milk yield, and impaired teat and udder health. Traditionally, portable electronic milk meters have been used to assess the presence of delayed milk ejection in dairy cows. By contrast, incremental milk flow rates from on-farm milk meters and their suitability as a measure to assess delayed milk ejection have not been studied by rigorous methods. The objectives were (1) to describe a protocol for identification of cows with chronically delayed milk ejection (CDME) and (2) to investigate risk factors for CDME using incremental milk flow rates obtained from automated on-farm milk meters. In a retrospective case control study, milk flow data from a 4,300-cow dairy with a thrice-daily milking schedule were obtained over a 1-wk period. Incremental milk flow rates (0-15 s, 15-30 s, 30-60 s, and 60-120 s) were used to identify cows with delayed milk ejection. Cases of CDME were defined as presence of delayed milk ejection at all 21 milking observations. Cows that had no delayed milk ejection at any of the same 21 milking observations were included as controls. A total of 171 cases and 393 controls were included in the study based on these criteria. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate associations of the following risk factors with CDME: parity (1, 2, ≥3), stage of lactation (<100, 101-200, >200 DIM), presence of a nonlactating quarter, milk somatic cell count, average daily milk production, and health and management events. Parity and CDME were associated such that compared with cows in their third or greater lactation, the odds (95% confidence intervals, 95% CI) of CDME were 1.27 (0.71-2.25) for cows in their first and 4.77 (2.47-9.22) for animals in their second lactation. The odds of CDME increased with increasing stage of lactation, with an odds ratio of 0.20 (0.11-0.36) for early and 0.28 (0.15-0.52) for mid-lactation animals, respectively, compared with late lactation cows. A 1-kg increase in average daily milk production was associated with decreased odds of CDME [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.89 (0.87-0.92)]. A lameness event during the study period increased the odds of CDME [odds ratio (95% CI): 8.04 (1.20-53.83)], as did a vaccination event 1 wk before the study period [odds ratio (95% CI): 4.07 (0.99-16.71)]. This study confirmed associations between CDME and previously reported risk factors and identified several previously less rigorously investigated health and management events that could be associated with CDME. Incremental milk flow rates from individual cows serve as an automated tool to evaluate milk flow dynamics. This information could be used to improve individual premilking udder preparation to meet the animal's physiological requirements, improve teat and udder health, and enhance parlor efficiency.

[1]  Paolo Moroni,et al.  Vacuum Dynamics as an Alternative Method for Detection of Bimodal Milk Ejection in Dairy Cows , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[2]  D. Nydam,et al.  The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily. , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  A randomized trial to study the effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milking performance, teat condition, and udder health. , 2020, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  R. Erskine,et al.  Decreased milk yield is associated with delayed milk ejection. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  R. Erskine,et al.  Herd-level variables associated with premilking stimulation time in Michigan dairy herds. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  A. Zecconi,et al.  Effects of chronic mastitis and its treatment with ketoprofen on the milk ejection curve , 2018, Journal of Dairy Research.

[7]  H. Whay,et al.  The Impact of Lameness on Welfare of the Dairy Cow. , 2017, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[8]  E. Pajor,et al.  Cow-level associations of lameness, behavior, and milk yield of cows milked in automated systems. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  The effect of manual and mechanical stimulation on oxytocin release and milking characteristics in Holstein cows milked 3 times daily. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  C. Maltecca,et al.  Bimodality and the genetics of milk flow traits in the Italian Holstein-Friesian breed. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  C. Maltecca,et al.  Genetic evaluations for measures of the milk-flow curve in the Italian Brown Swiss population. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Best combination of pre-stimulation and latency period duration before cluster attachment for efficient oxytocin release and milk ejection in cows with low to high udder-filling levels. , 2011, The Journal of dairy research.

[13]  L. Bava,et al.  Milk emission and udder health status in primiparous dairy cows during lactation , 2009, Journal of Dairy Research.

[14]  J. Elsener,et al.  Comparison of postvaccinal milk drop in dairy cattle vaccinated with one of two different commercial vaccines. , 2008, Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine.

[15]  L. Bava,et al.  Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  V. Tančin,et al.  Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  C. Knight,et al.  Changes in cisternal compartment based on stage of lactation and time since milk ejection in the udder of dairy cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  R. Erskine,et al.  Mastitis therapy and pharmacology. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[19]  L. Green,et al.  The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  G. Atkins,et al.  Effects of 2 commercially-available 9-way killed vaccines on milk production and rectal temperature in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. , 2001, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[21]  Y T Gröhn,et al.  The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Milk ejection in dairy cows at different degrees of udder filling , 2001, Journal of Dairy Research.

[23]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  MILK EJECTION AND MILK REMOVAL OF SINGLE QUARTERS IN HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS NIST , 1999 .

[24]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  D. Sprecher,et al.  A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. , 1997, Theriogenology.

[26]  K. Frankena,et al.  Effect on milk production of vaccination with a bovine herpesvirus 1 gene-deleted vaccine , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[27]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Simultaneous recording of oxytocin release, milk ejection and milk flow during milking of dairy cows with and without prestimulation , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[28]  C. Knight,et al.  Milk accumulation and distribution in the bovine udder during the interval between milkings , 1994, Journal of Dairy Research.

[29]  D. Schams,et al.  Milk removal in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings: concentrations of oxytocin, prolactin, cortisol and β–endorphin , 1993, Journal of Dairy Research.