Differentiated Effects of Robot Hand Training With and Without Neural Guidance on Neuroplasticity Patterns in Chronic Stroke

Robot-assisted training combined with neural guided strategy has been increasingly applied to stroke rehabilitation. However, the induced neuroplasticity is seldom characterized. It is still uncertain whether this kind of guidance could enhance the long-term training effect for stroke motor recovery. This study was conducted to explore the clinical improvement and the neurological changes after 20-session guided or non-guided robot hand training using two measures: changes in brain discriminant ability between motor-imagery and resting states revealed from electroencephalography (EEG) signals and changes in brain network variability revealed from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in 24 chronic stroke subjects. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either combined action observation (AO) with EEG-guided robot-hand training (RobotEEG_AO, n = 13) or robot-hand training without AO and EEG guidance (Robotnon−EEG_Text, n = 11). The robot hand in RobotEEG_AO group was activated only when significant mu suppression (8–12 Hz) was detected from subjects' EEG signals in ipsilesional hemisphere, while the robot hand in Robotnon−EEG_Text group was randomly activated regardless of their EEG signals. Paretic upper-limb motor functions were evaluated at three time-points: before, immediately after and 6 months after the interventions. Only RobotEEG_AO group showed a long-term significant improvement in their upper-limb motor functions while no significant and long-lasting training effect on the paretic motor functions was shown in Robotnon−EEG_Text group. Significant neuroplasticity changes were only observed in RobotEEG_AO group as well. The brain discriminant ability based on the ipsilesional EEG signals significantly improved after intervention. For brain network variability, the whole brain was first divided into six functional subnetworks, and significant increase in the temporal variability was found in four out of the six subnetworks, including sensory-motor areas, attention network, auditory network, and default mode network after intervention. Our results revealed the differences in the long-term training effect and the neuroplasticity changes following the two interventional strategies: with and without neural guidance. The findings might imply that sustainable motor function improvement could be achieved through proper neural guidance, which might provide insights into strategies for effective stroke rehabilitation. Furthermore, neuroplasticity could be promoted more profoundly by the intervention with proper neurofeedback, and might be shaped in relation to better motor skill acquisition.

[1]  David T. Jones,et al.  Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  K. Y. Tong,et al.  An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: Task training system for stroke rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[3]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Association between heart rate variability and fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  L. Richards,et al.  Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  D. Skuse.  Recovery , 2010, International psychiatry : bulletin of the Board of International Affairs of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

[6]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  EEG topographies provide subject-specific correlates of motor control , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[8]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[9]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  David T. Jones,et al.  Nonstationarity in the ‘resting brain's’ modular architecture , 2012, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[11]  E. A. Susanto,et al.  The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Martin J McKeown,et al.  New brain networks are active after right MCA stroke when moving the ipsilesional arm , 2005, Neurology.

[14]  S. Silvoni,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke: A Review of Progress , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[15]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  J. Pineda,et al.  Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Towards a statistical test for functional connectivity dynamics , 2015, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Dynamic Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[19]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Common intrinsic connectivity states among posteromedial cortex subdivisions: Insights from analysis of temporal dynamics , 2014, NeuroImage.

[21]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  Evaluation of sliding window correlation performance for characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states , 2016, NeuroImage.

[22]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  The Role of Multiple Contralesional Motor Areas for Complex Hand Movements after Internal Capsular Lesion , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Cortical and subcortical mechanisms of brain‐machine interfaces , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[25]  R. Nudo.  Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. , 2003, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[26]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Depression uncouples brain hate circuit , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[27]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Steven C. Cramer.  Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[29]  Vladimir Bostanov,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data sets Ib and IIb: feature extraction from event-related brain potentials with the continuous wavelet transform and the t-value scalogram , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Effective Preprocessing Procedures Virtually Eliminate Distance-Dependent Motion Artifacts in Resting State FMRI , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[31]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[33]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  S. Bentin,et al.  Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movements: A comparison between EEG desynchronization in the μ-range and previous fMRI results , 2009, Brain Research.

[35]  Bryon A. Mueller,et al.  Altered resting state complexity in schizophrenia , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke , 2015, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[39]  Yong He,et al.  Individual differences and time-varying features of modular brain architecture , 2017, NeuroImage.

[40]  S. Small,et al.  Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Neural, electrophysiological and anatomical basis of brain-network variability and its characteristic changes in mental disorders. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Electrophysiological manifestations of mirror visual feedback during manual movement , 2015, Brain Research.

[44]  E. Garcia-Rill.  The 10 Hz Fulcrum , 2015 .

[45]  Alexis Wright,et al.  Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) , 2012, The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy.

[46]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Functional Network Dynamics of the Language System , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  D. Bassett,et al.  The flexible brain This scientific commentary refers to ‘ Neural , electrophysiological and ana-5 tomical basis of brain-network variability and its characteristic changes in mental disorders , 2022 .

[49]  Sheng Li.  Movement-specific enhancement of corticospinal excitability at subthreshold levels during motor imagery , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Brain state expression and transitions are related to complex executive cognition in normative neurodevelopment , 2018, NeuroImage.

[51]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[53]  L. Lenchik.  Functional imaging , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  Thomas Maribo,et al.  The Fugl–Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[55]  Juan Zhou,et al.  Spontaneous eyelid closures link vigilance fluctuation with fMRI dynamic connectivity states , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Brain-computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[57]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[59]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[60]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Altered topological properties of the cortical motor‐related network in patients with subcortical stroke revealed by graph theoretical analysis , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[63]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Dynamics of Sensorimotor Cortical Oscillations during the Observation of Hand Movements: An EEG Study , 2012, PloS one.

[64]  E. A. Susanto,et al.  Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[65]  Christa Neuper,et al.  An asynchronously controlled EEG-based virtual keyboard: improvement of the spelling rate , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.