Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

The aim of this study was to validate a recently proposed MRI-based T(1)-mapping method for analysis of whole-body adipose tissue (AT) using an established CT protocol as reference and to include results from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). 10 subjects, drawn from the Swedish Obese Subjects Sibling-pairs study, were examined using CT, MRI and DEXA. The CT analysis was based on 28 imaged slices. T(1) maps were calculated using contiguous MRI data from two different gradient echo sequences acquired using different flip angles. CT and MRI comparison was performed slice-wise and for the whole-body region. Fat weights were compared between all three modalities. Strong correlations (r > or = 0.977, p<0.0001) were found between MRI and CT whole-body and AT volumes. MRI visceral AT volume was underestimated by 0.79 +/- 0.75 l (p = 0.005), but total AT was not significantly different from that estimated by CT (MRI - CT = -0.61+/-1.17 l; p = 0.114). DEXA underestimated fat weights by 5.23 +/- 1.71 kg (p = 0.005) compared with CT. MRI underestimated whole-body volume by 2.03 +/- 1.61 l (p = 0.005) compared with CT. Weights estimated either by CT or by DEXA were not significantly different from weights measured using scales. In conclusion, strong correlations were found between whole-body AT results from CT, MRI-based T(1) mapping and DEXA. If the differences between the results from T(1)-mapping and CT-based analysis are accepted, the T(1)-mapping method allows fully automated post-processing of whole-body MRI data, allowing longitudinal whole-body studies that are also applicable for children and adolescents.

[1]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Swedish obese subjects (SOS). Recruitment for an intervention study and a selected description of the obese state. , 1992, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[2]  G. Starck,et al.  A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  S. Ol Body composition and fat distribution by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in overweight postmenopausal women. Effect of energy-restriction and exercise. , 1996 .

[4]  C. Block,et al.  Mechanisms linking obesity with cardiovascular disease , 2006, Nature.

[5]  Hans Frimmel,et al.  Whole‐body T1 mapping improves the definition of adipose tissue: Consequences for automated image analysis , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  R. Ross Advances in the application of imaging methods in applied and clinical physiology , 2003, Acta Diabetologica.

[7]  M. Jensen,et al.  Preventing overestimation of pixels in computed tomography assessment of visceral fat. , 2004, Obesity research.

[8]  L. Bachrach,et al.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements of bone density and body composition: promise and pitfalls. , 2000, Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM.

[9]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[10]  J. Cauley,et al.  The prediction of visceral fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomography and anthropometry , 2002, International Journal of Obesity.

[11]  L. Sjöström,et al.  Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[12]  L. Plank,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition , 2005, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[13]  O. Svendsen,et al.  Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[14]  S B Heymsfield,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  L. Sjöström Swedish Obese Subjects, SOS , 2002 .

[16]  Sergio Silvestri,et al.  Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[17]  R. Ross,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human Body Composition Research: From Quantitative to Qualitative Tissue Measurement , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Claude Bouchard,et al.  Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Ellis Human body composition: in vivo methods. , 2000, Physiological reviews.

[20]  Sören Mattsson,et al.  Development of methods for body composition studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. Kullberg,et al.  Automated and reproducible segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue from abdominal MRI , 2007, International Journal of Obesity.

[22]  Claude Pichard,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods. , 2002, Nutrition.

[23]  M Alpsten,et al.  A multicompartment body composition technique based on computerized tomography. , 1994, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.