Information Systems as a Practical Discipline
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Izak Benbasat,et al. Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[2] Ryad Titah,et al. Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..
[3] Alan R. Hevner,et al. Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..
[4] Klaus Turowski,et al. Classification framework for business components , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[5] Richard Baskerville,et al. Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice , 2009, MIS Q..
[6] Nik R Hassan,et al. Is information systems a discipline? Foucauldian and Toulminian insights , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[7] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[8] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[9] Grace J. Johnson,et al. Interactivity and its Facets Revisited: Theory and Empirical Test , 2006 .
[10] Sandeep Purao,et al. Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..
[11] J. Bailenson,et al. The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .
[12] Ben Light,et al. Locating packaged software in information systems research , 2007 .
[13] Barbara H Wixom,et al. A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..
[14] C. Grönroos. A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .
[15] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..
[16] T. Davenport. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.
[17] H. Hermans. Introduction: The Dialogical Self in a Global and Digital Age , 2004 .
[18] Machiko Kusahara. The Art of Creating Subjective Reality: An Analysis of Japanese Digital Pets , 2001, Leonardo.
[19] Batya Friedman,et al. Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.
[20] Stephen Boyd Davis,et al. Constructing a Player-Centred Definition of Fun for Video Games Design , 2004, BCS HCI.
[21] Anol Bhattacherjee,et al. Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..
[22] Noam Tractinsky,et al. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .
[23] Juhani Iivari. Implementability of in-House Developed vs. Application package Based Information Systems. , 1986 .
[24] Izak Benbasat,et al. Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..
[25] Juhani Iivari,et al. Implementation of in-house developed vs application package based information systems , 1990, DATB.
[26] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[27] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..
[28] Briony J. Oates,et al. New frontiers for information systems research: computer art as an information system , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[29] Aaron Kozbelt. Originality and Technical Skill as Components of Artistic Quality , 2004 .
[30] Ahmed Elfatatry,et al. Dealing with change: components versus services , 2007, CACM.
[31] Juhani Iivari,et al. A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[32] S. Strasser,et al. Understanding and explanation : basic ideas concerning the humanity of the human sciences , 1985 .
[33] Peter Meso,et al. Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[34] Fatemeh Zahedi,et al. Strategy-based design of reusable business components , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).
[35] Shoshana Zuboff,et al. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .
[36] B. Kaplan,et al. Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[37] Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al. Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[38] Na Li,et al. The importance of affective quality , 2005, CACM.
[39] Ephraim R. McLean,et al. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..
[40] Claire Massey,et al. The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming , 2004 .
[41] Paolo Traverso,et al. Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges , 2007, Computer.
[42] Younghwa Lee,et al. The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[43] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[44] Henry C. Lucas,et al. The information systems identity crisis , 2005 .
[45] Julie Fisher,et al. E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[46] Keng Siau,et al. Information Technology and Systems - I Systems Analysis and Design: Should We Be Researching What We Teach? , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[47] Ephraim R. McLean,et al. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[48] John D. Murphy,et al. Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[49] Rex Eugene Pereira. Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms , 1999, DATB.
[50] D. E. Sofiane Tebboune,et al. Application service provision: origins and development , 2003, Bus. Process. Manag. J..
[51] Joseph Bates,et al. The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.
[52] Shirley Gregor,et al. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..
[53] Matt Germonprez,et al. Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[54] Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[55] A. Michael Noll,et al. The Beginnings of Computer Art in the United States: A Memoir , 1995, Comput. Graph..
[56] Richard O. Mason,et al. Comments on the Weber commentary and Lyytinen/King response , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[57] Ernest A. Edmonds,et al. Approaches to interactive art systems , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.
[58] Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al. Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.
[59] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[60] Alessandra Talamo,et al. Strategic Identities in Cyberspace , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..
[61] Henry C. Lucas,et al. Implementing Packaged Software , 1987, MIS Q..
[62] Sally J. McMillan. Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .
[63] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[64] Y. Kowitlawakul. The Technology Acceptance Model: Predicting Nurses' Intention to Use Telemedicine Technology (eICU) , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.
[65] Masahiro Fujita,et al. AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..
[66] Maurice Landry,et al. Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.