Information Systems as a Practical Discipline

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  Klaus Turowski,et al.  Classification framework for business components , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice , 2009, MIS Q..

[6]  Nik R Hassan,et al.  Is information systems a discipline? Foucauldian and Toulminian insights , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[9]  Grace J. Johnson,et al.  Interactivity and its Facets Revisited: Theory and Empirical Test , 2006 .

[10]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[11]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .

[12]  Ben Light,et al.  Locating packaged software in information systems research , 2007 .

[13]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  C. Grönroos A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .

[15]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[16]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[17]  H. Hermans Introduction: The Dialogical Self in a Global and Digital Age , 2004 .

[18]  Machiko Kusahara The Art of Creating Subjective Reality: An Analysis of Japanese Digital Pets , 2001, Leonardo.

[19]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Stephen Boyd Davis,et al.  Constructing a Player-Centred Definition of Fun for Video Games Design , 2004, BCS HCI.

[21]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[23]  Juhani Iivari Implementability of in-House Developed vs. Application package Based Information Systems. , 1986 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[25]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Implementation of in-house developed vs application package based information systems , 1990, DATB.

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Briony J. Oates,et al.  New frontiers for information systems research: computer art as an information system , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Aaron Kozbelt Originality and Technical Skill as Components of Artistic Quality , 2004 .

[30]  Ahmed Elfatatry,et al.  Dealing with change: components versus services , 2007, CACM.

[31]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  S. Strasser,et al.  Understanding and explanation : basic ideas concerning the humanity of the human sciences , 1985 .

[33]  Peter Meso,et al.  Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Strategy-based design of reusable business components , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[35]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[36]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[37]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Na Li,et al.  The importance of affective quality , 2005, CACM.

[39]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Claire Massey,et al.  The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming , 2004 .

[41]  Paolo Traverso,et al.  Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges , 2007, Computer.

[42]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[44]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The information systems identity crisis , 2005 .

[45]  Julie Fisher,et al.  E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Keng Siau,et al.  Information Technology and Systems - I Systems Analysis and Design: Should We Be Researching What We Teach? , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  John D. Murphy,et al.  Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Rex Eugene Pereira Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms , 1999, DATB.

[50]  D. E. Sofiane Tebboune,et al.  Application service provision: origins and development , 2003, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[51]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[52]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[53]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[55]  A. Michael Noll,et al.  The Beginnings of Computer Art in the United States: A Memoir , 1995, Comput. Graph..

[56]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  Comments on the Weber commentary and Lyytinen/King response , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Ernest A. Edmonds,et al.  Approaches to interactive art systems , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.

[58]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[59]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[60]  Alessandra Talamo,et al.  Strategic Identities in Cyberspace , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[61]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementing Packaged Software , 1987, MIS Q..

[62]  Sally J. McMillan Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[63]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[64]  Y. Kowitlawakul The Technology Acceptance Model: Predicting Nurses' Intention to Use Telemedicine Technology (eICU) , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[65]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  AIBO: Toward the Era of Digital Creatures , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[66]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.