The Electron Microscopy eXchange (EMX) initiative.

Three-dimensional electron microscopy (3DEM) of ice-embedded samples allows the structural analysis of large biological macromolecules close to their native state. Different techniques have been developed during the last forty years to process cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data. Not surprisingly, success in analysis and interpretation is highly correlated with the continuous development of image processing packages. The field has matured to the point where further progress in data and methods sharing depends on an agreement between the packages on how to describe common image processing tasks. Such standardization will facilitate the use of software as well as seamless collaboration, allowing the sharing of rich information between different platforms. Our aim here is to describe the Electron Microscopy eXchange (EMX) initiative, launched at the 2012 Instruct Image Processing Center Developer Workshop, with the intention of developing a first set of standard conventions for the interchange of information for single-particle analysis (EMX version 1.0). These conventions cover the specification of the metadata for micrograph and particle images, including contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters and particle orientations. EMX v1.0 has already been implemented in the Bsoft, EMAN, Xmipp and Scipion image processing packages. It has been and will be used in the CTF and EMDataBank Validation Challenges respectively. It is also being used in EMPIAR, the Electron Microscopy Pilot Image Archive, which stores raw image data related to the 3DEM reconstructions in EMDB.

[1]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Design and implementation of microarray gene expression markup language (MAGE-ML) , 2002, Genome Biology.

[2]  U. Truyen,et al.  [Electron microscopy]. , 1997, Tierarztliche Praxis.

[3]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  Kei-Hoi Cheung,et al.  BioPAX – A community standard for pathway data sharing , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  The Functional Genomics Experiment model (FuGE): an extensible framework for standards in functional genomics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  W. Kühlbrandt The Resolution Revolution , 2014, Science.

[7]  B. Carragher,et al.  A helical processing pipeline for EM structure determination of membrane proteins. , 2011, Methods.

[8]  Mónica Chagoyen,et al.  Common conventions for interchange and archiving of three-dimensional electron microscopy information in structural biology. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  Michael Hucka,et al.  The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 2 Version 2 , 2007 .

[10]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  M. Baker,et al.  Outcome of the First Electron Microscopy Validation Task Force Meeting , 2012, Structure.

[12]  Oliver Hofmann,et al.  ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level , 2010, Bioinform..

[13]  C. Sander,et al.  The HUPO PSI's Molecular Interaction format—a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  Development of data representation standards by the human proteome organization proteomics standards initiative , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[16]  A. Bartesaghi,et al.  2.2 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase in complex with a cell-permeant inhibitor , 2015, Science.

[17]  Wen Jiang,et al.  CTF Challenge: Result summary. , 2015, Journal of structural biology.

[18]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J Bernard Heymann,et al.  Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  J M Carazo,et al.  Xmipp 3.0: an improved software suite for image processing in electron microscopy. , 2013, Journal of structural biology.

[21]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[22]  F. Thon,et al.  Phase Contrast Electron Microscopy , 1971 .

[23]  Andreas Dräger,et al.  Improving Collaboration by Standardization Efforts in Systems Biology , 2014, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[24]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Alvis Brazma,et al.  Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) – Successes, Failures, Challenges , 2009, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[26]  J. Frank Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2006 .

[27]  Matthew L. Baker,et al.  An atomic model of brome mosaic virus using direct electron detection and real-space optimization , 2014, Nature Communications.

[28]  Marin van Heel,et al.  IMAGIC - A FAST, FLEXIBLE AND FRIENDLY IMAGE-ANALYSIS SOFTWARE SYSTEM , 1981 .

[29]  A. Cheng,et al.  2.8 Å resolution reconstruction of the Thermoplasma acidophilum 20S proteasome using cryo-electron microscopy , 2015, eLife.

[30]  P. Penczek,et al.  A Primer to Single-Particle Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2015, Cell.

[31]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[32]  Roberto Marabini,et al.  MRC2014: Extensions to the MRC format header for electron cryo-microscopy and tomography , 2015, Journal of structural biology.