Anatomical projection of the cervical uncinate process in ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery.

OBJECT The cervical uncinate processes (UPs), their variations, and the relationships between the neurovascular structures and surrounding bone were investigated in this anatomical study. The object of this study was to highlight the important surgery-related considerations associated with ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery. METHODS Forty-nine adult C3-7 dry bone samples were used, and 10 measurements were obtained for each vertebra. The anterior measurements involved the cervical uncinate process (UP): height, width, length, distance between its tip and vertebral foramina, interuncinate process distance, sagittal angle with the superior margin of the vertebral body (VB), VB anteroposterior diameter, and VB width. Posterior measurements involved the vertical distance between the superior border of the lamina at the lamina-facet joint and the tip of the UP, as well as the horizontal distance between the medial-most border of the superior facet and the tip of the UP. All symmetrical structures were measured bilaterally. There were no statistically significant differences between right- and left-sided measurements in this series. The height of the UP increased gradually at each segmental level between C-3 and C-7. The width of the UP did not change with segmental level (5.0 mm at C-3 compared with 5.3 mm at C-7). On average, the length of the UP was relatively constant. The distance from the tip of the UP to vertebral foramina averaged 1 mm at the C2-3 level and 1.5 mm at the C5-6 level. Interuncinate distance and VB width gradually increased and were highly variable, which appeared to be related with osteophyte formation. There was a slight gradual increase from C-3 to lower segments, and it paralleled with the midline anteroposterior diameter of the same VB. The angle between the UP and the superior margin of the VB exhibited great variety. The posterior measurements decreased gradually from C-3 to C-7. CONCLUSIONS Based on the data obtained in this study, a surgeon is provided with a three-dimensional orientation as well as anatomical knowledge. This knowledge also allows for a more effective neurovascular decompression by minimizing the surgery-related complications.

[1]  R. Yeasting,et al.  The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine. , 1999, Surgical neurology.

[2]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Cervical uncinate process: an anatomic study for anterior decompression of the cervical spine , 1998, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[3]  V. Goel,et al.  Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5‐C6 segment , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  T. G. Pait,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[5]  H. Jho Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  C. Dickman,et al.  Repair of Vertebral Artery Injury During Anterior Cervical Decompression , 1994, Spine.

[7]  S. Emery,et al.  Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  R Vanderby,et al.  Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy of the Middle and Lower Regions , 1991, Spine.

[10]  H. Herkowitz,et al.  Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. , 1990 .

[11]  A. Tateishi,et al.  Anterolateral uncoforaminotomy for cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  J. Myklebust,et al.  Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Facetectomy and Fixation Techniques , 1988, Spine.

[13]  A. Biondi,et al.  Foraminal cervical herniated disc treated by anterior discoforaminotomy. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[14]  A. Hakuba Trans-unco-discal approach. A combined anterior and lateral approach to cervical discs. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  H. Verbiest A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications. , 1968, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  R. B. Cloward The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  J. Spillane,et al.  The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. , 1957, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  J. S. Barr,et al.  脊椎管を侵す椎間板のヘルニア(Rupture of the Intervertebral Disc with Involvement of the Spinal Canal) , 1934 .