The development of a general Internet attitudes scale

The popularity of Internet use has generated a need for reliable and valid Internet attitude assessments. Current practices in the development and validation of Internet attitude scales have raised several methodological and practical issues. The purpose of this study was to develop general Internet attitudes measure as well as to explore the psychometric and methodological concerns surrounding the construct validity of existing Internet attitude scales. A three-study sequence was conducted that included the development and refinement of the Attitudes Towards the Internet Scale (ATIS), an investigation of differences between Internet and paper-and-pencil administrations, and differential item and person functioning. The ATIS demonstrated appropriate psychometric qualities and is suitable for general use. Suggestions for future researchers and practitioners interested in the assessment of Internet attitudes are provided.

[1]  John R. Barrows,et al.  Internet Use and Collegiate Academic Performance Decrements: Early Findings , 2001 .

[2]  Yixin Zhang,et al.  Age, gender, and Internet attitudes among employees in the business world , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Jeffrey Barlow,et al.  Internet and American Life Project , 2006 .

[4]  George A. Johanson.  Differential Item Functioning in Attitude Assessment , 1997 .

[5]  Chien Chou,et al.  Incidences and correlates of Internet anxiety among high school teachers in Taiwan , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Privacy and Attitudes Towards Internet-Based Selection Systems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2003 .

[7]  T. Crowl,et al.  Fundamentals of Educational Research , 1993 .

[8]  Chien Chou,et al.  Tool, Toy, Telephone, Territory, or Treasure of Information: Elementary school students' attitudes toward the Internet , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  S. Presser,et al.  Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. , 1988 .

[11]  Lei Chang,et al.  Connotatively Consistent and Reversed Connotatively Inconsistent Items are Not Fully Equivalent: Generalizability Study , 1995 .

[12]  Paul D. Umbach.  Web surveys: Best practices , 2004 .

[13]  Margaret Richardson,et al.  ‘Getting on’: older New Zealanders’ perceptions of computing , 2005, New Media Soc..

[14]  Paula M. Popovich,et al.  Updating the attitudes toward computer usage scale using American undergraduate students , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Internet attitudes and Internet use: some surprising findings from the HomeNetToo project , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[18]  Hamzeh Dodeen,et al.  An Analysis of Sex-related Differential Item Functioning in Attitude Assessment , 2003 .

[19]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: relationship, prediction, and difference , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Developing an Internet Attitude Scale for high school students , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Caroline Presno,et al.  Taking the Byte Out of Internet Anxiety: Instructional Techniques That Reduce Computer/Internet Anxiety in the Classroom , 1998 .

[23]  C. Blumer,et al.  The Development of the Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale , 1987 .

[24]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[25]  Paula M. Popovich,et al.  Comparing attitudes towards computer usage by undergraduates from 1986 to 2005 , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  J. Best,et al.  Research in Education , 1966, Nature.

[27]  Yixin Zhang.  Development and validation of an internet use attitude scale , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[28]  George A. Johanson,et al.  Acquiescence as differential person functioning , 2004 .

[29]  Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.  Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Traci Anderson,et al.  Relationships among Internet Attitudes, Internet Use, Romantic Beliefs, and Perceptions of Online Romantic Relationships , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  Yin Zhang.  Using the Internet for survey research: a case study , 2000 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Gary J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Educational Research , 1998 .

[34]  Gi Woong Yun,et al.  Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..