Recruitment to multicentre trials

To obtain clear and definitive answers to clinically important questions, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with sufficiently large sample sizes are needed, which usually requires recruitment in several centres. A common problem in multicentre trials is that recruitment is slower or more difficult than expected, and many trials fail to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. If the target sample size is not achieved, the trial has less power to discover differences between the groups, so the results may be less useful. If recruitment has to be extended to reach the required sample size, the trial will take longer and cost more than planned, delaying the use of the results in clinical practice. The more expensive trials become and the longer they take, the fewer can be conducted with the funding and resources available. It is therefore important to understand the reasons for poor recruitment and find effective strategies to improve it.

[1]  R. Lilford,et al.  Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect". , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  R. Prescott,et al.  Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[3]  P. Steer,et al.  Reasons for declining participation in a prospective randomized trial to determine the optimum mode of delivery of the preterm breech. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[4]  N. Thatcher,et al.  Conducting clinical research in the new NHS: the model of cancer , 1994, BMJ.

[5]  R. Prescott,et al.  Multi-centre clinical respiratory research: a new approach? , 1998, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[6]  Dickinson Cj Clinical research in the NHS today. , 1994 .

[7]  P. Windsor Randomised controlled trials in perinatal medicine: 2. Recruitment of a pregnant woman or her newborn child into more than one trial , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[9]  J. Lumley,et al.  A failed RCT to determine the best method of delivery for very low birth weight infants. , 1985, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  T. Meade,et al.  Is recruitment more difficult with a placebo arm in randomised controlled trials? A quasirandomised, interview based study , 1999, BMJ.