Innovative Feed-In Tariff Designs that Limit Policy Costs

Feed-in tariffs (FITs) are the most prevalent renewable energy policy used globally to date, and there are many benefits to the certainty offered in the marketplace to reduce development risks and associated financing costs and to grow the renewable energy industry. However, concerns over escalating costs in jurisdictions with FIT policies have led to increased attention on cost control in renewable energy policy design. In recent years, policy mechanisms for containing FIT costs have become more refined, allowing policymakers to exert greater control on policy outcomes and on the resulting costs to ratepayers. As policymakers and regulators in the United States begin to explore the use of FITs, careful consideration must be given to the ways in which policy design can be used to balance the policies' advantages while bounding its costs. This report explores mechanisms that policymakers have implemented to limit FIT policy costs. If designed clearly and transparently, such mechanisms can align policymaker and market expectations for project deployment. Three different policy tools are evaluated: (1) caps, (2) payment level adjustment mechanisms, and (3) auction-based designs. The report employs case studies to explore the strengths and weaknesses of these three cost containment tools. These tools are then evaluatedmore » with a set of criteria including predictability for policymakers and the marketplace and the potential for unintended consequences.« less

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Onshore wind power development in China: Challenges behind a successful story , 2009 .

[2]  Moisès Graells,et al.  Promotion of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 1998-2008 , 2010 .

[3]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Assessment and optimisation of renewable energy support schemes in the European electricity market , 2007 .

[4]  Fereidoon P. Sioshansi Competitive electricity markets: questions remain about design, implementation, performance , 2008 .

[5]  la energía y la tecnología de la central eléctrica Calefacción California Solar Initiative , 2011 .

[6]  A. David,et al.  Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: a literature survey , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[7]  R. Bhandari,et al.  Grid parity analysis of solar photovoltaic systems in Germany using experience curves , 2009 .

[8]  Eric Martinot Renewable power for China: Past, present, and future , 2010 .

[9]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The renewable portfolio standard:: design considerations and an implementation survey , 2001 .

[10]  S. Tierney,et al.  Competitive Procurement of Retail Electricity Supply: Recent Trends in State Policies and Utility Practices , 2009 .

[11]  M. Frondel,et al.  Economic Impacts from the Promotion of Renewable Energy Technologies - The German Experience , 2009 .

[12]  Karlynn Cory,et al.  Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policy Design , 2010 .

[13]  N. Darghouth,et al.  Tracking the Sun II: The Installed Cost of Photovoltaics in the U.S. from 1998-2008 , 2010 .

[14]  G. Barbose,et al.  Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States - A Status Report with Data Through 2007 , 2008 .

[15]  H. Rudnick,et al.  LESSONS FROM FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN ENERGY CONTRACT AUCTIONS IN SOUTH AMERICA , 2010 .

[16]  Hugh Rudnick,et al.  Auction approaches of long-term contracts to ensure generation investment in electricity markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean experiences $ , 2010 .

[17]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Price of Policy Risk - Empirical Insights from Choice Experiments with European Photovoltaic Project Developers , 2012 .

[18]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Powering the Green Economy: The Feed-in Tariff Handbook , 2009 .