Social sustainability dimensions in the seismic risk reduction of public schools: a case study of Lima, Peru

Abstract The provision of education is a vital feature of a socially sustainable system. However, students in highly seismic areas are under permanent hazard, a critical situation for student populations with high vulnerability factors such as insecure infrastructure, low teacher salaries, and poor living conditions due to social exclusion and inequity. In this article, we use community-based elements, such as institutional arrangements and a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach, to develop a comprehensive multi-scale risk model for socially sustainable seismic risk reduction in schools. We analyze the case of schools in the city of Lima, Peru, integrating aims, objectives, and methodologies based on risk-reduction strategy from previous disciplinary studies. Identifying schools that, on one hand, can be most useful during emergencyrelief work and, on the other hand, educational facilities that could cause the most harm to students are priorities for a risk-reduction strategy. We identify social sustainability factors in schools, such as security and well-being of the student population, accessibility, incomes, basic service provision, and community organization. Specifying the spatial and territorial relationships within public school surroundings is essential to guaranteeing the effectiveness and efficiency of risk-mitigation strategies.

[1]  G. Bramley,et al.  Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type , 2009 .

[2]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk-Based Seismic Retrofit Prioritization of Reinforced Concrete Civic Infrastructure: Case Study for State of Oregon Schools and Emergency Facilities , 2012 .

[3]  Andrew Maskrey,et al.  Revisiting community-based disaster risk management , 2011 .

[4]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary Report , 2005 .

[5]  M. Blondet,et al.  EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT PERFORMANCE OF PERUVIAN SCHOOL BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[6]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[7]  Jonathan M. Harris A Survey of Sustainable Development: Social And Economic Dimensions , 2001 .

[8]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy , 2007 .

[9]  Liang-Chun Chen,et al.  Integrated Community-Based Disaster Management Program in Taiwan: A Case Study of Shang-An Village , 2006 .

[10]  David Hattis,et al.  Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation of School Buildings (K-12). , 2002 .

[11]  Koko Warner,et al.  Gestión de riesgo de desastres naturales: Sistemas nacionales para la gestión integral del riesgo de desastres: Estrategias financieras para la reconstrucción en caso de desastres naturales , 2003 .

[12]  Mahmood Hosseini,et al.  Towards resilient communities in developing countries through education of children for disaster preparedness , 2005 .

[13]  Miryam Rivera-Holguín,et al.  A post disaster capacity building model in Peru , 2016 .

[14]  Norio Okada,et al.  Community Diagnosis for Sustainable Disaster Preparedness , 2006 .

[15]  Joern Birkmann,et al.  Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: towards disaster resilient societies , 2007 .

[16]  Bostenaru Dan Multi-criteria decision model for retrofitting existing buildings , 2003 .