Cramér-Rao Bounds for direction finding by an acoustic vector-sensor under unknown gain / phase uncertainties

An acoustic vector-sensor (a.k.a. vector-hydrophone in underwater applications) is composed of two or three spatially collocated but orthogonally oriented acoustic velocity-sensors, plus possibly a collocated acoustic pressure-sensor. An acoustic vector-sensor is versatile for direction-finding, due to its azimuth- elevation spatial response's independence from the incident source's frequency, bandwidth, or radial location (i.e., in the near field as opposed to the far field). Unavailable in the current open literature is how the direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimates may be adversely affected by any unknown non-ideality in the acoustic vector-sensor. The non-ideality may include any unknown deviation from the nominal gain response and/or phase response. This paper pioneers a characterization of these various unknown non-idealities' relative degradation on direction-finding accuracy through Cramer-Rao Bound (CRB) analysis of how the estimation accuracy is degraded relatively by each such unknown non-ideality.

[1]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Near-field/far-field azimuth and elevation angle estimation using a single vector hydrophone , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Effects of sensor placement on acoustic vector-sensor array performance , 1999 .

[3]  Tianshuang Qiu,et al.  Underwater sources location in non-Gaussian impulsive noise environments , 2006, Digit. Signal Process..

[4]  William S. Hodgkiss,et al.  The simultaneous measurement of infrasonic acoustic particle velocity and acoustic pressure in the ocean by freely drifting Swallow floats , 1991 .

[5]  K.T. Wong,et al.  Self-initiating MUSIC-based direction finding in underwater acoustic particle velocity-field beamspace , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[6]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Identifiability in Array Processing Models with Vector-Sensor Applications , 1994, IEEE Seventh SP Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing.

[7]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Root-MUSIC-based azimuth-elevation angle-of-arrival estimation with uniformly spaced but arbitrarily oriented velocity hydrophones , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Extended-aperture underwater acoustic multisource azimuth/elevation direction-finding using uniformly but sparsely spaced vector hydrophones , 1997 .

[9]  J. C. Shipps,et al.  A miniature vector sensor for line array applications , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[10]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Closed-form underwater acoustic direction-finding with arbitrarily spaced vector hydrophones at unknown locations , 1997 .

[11]  W.S. Hodgkiss,et al.  A Vertical Array Of Directional Acoustic Sensors , 1992, OCEANS 92 Proceedings@m_Mastering the Oceans Through Technology.

[12]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Performance bounds for estimating vector systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  M. Elwenspoek,et al.  Three-dimensional sound intensity measurements using Microflown particle velocity sensors , 1999, Technical Digest. IEEE International MEMS 99 Conference. Twelfth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Cat. No.99CH36291).

[14]  W. Hodgkiss,et al.  Energetics of the deep ocean’s infrasonic sound field , 1991 .

[15]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Wideband source localization using a distributed acoustic vector-sensor array , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor beamforming and Capon direction estimation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  Parkins,et al.  Error analysis of a practical energy density sensor , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor array processing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..