The effect of traffic distribution and transport protocol on WLAN performance

Because the statistics of traffic load strongly impact on the queuing and blocking performance of a network, the choice of traffic distribution and transport protocol greatly influences WLAN performance. In this paper we examine the effect of traffic arrival distributions and transport protocols on WLAN performance. In particular, we analyze (by simulation) the effect of four diverse traffic models (Exponential, Pareto, Poisson, and CBR) on the performance of a typical IEEE 802.11 ad hoc network for TCP and UDP. Results obtained show that the network performance for Poisson is almost independent of traffic load for TCP and UDP but not for CBR. However, for both the Pareto and Exponential the network performance is almost independent of load for TCP, but is sensitive to UDP. The network achieves best and worst throughput performance for CBR and Poisson, respectively. Our findings reported in this paper provide some insight into the impact of the choice of traffic models and transport protocols on WLAN performance.

[1]  Shu-Gang Liu,et al.  Modeling and simulation of self-similar data traffic , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[2]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation modelling and analysis , 1991 .

[3]  Svilen Ivanov,et al.  Experimental Validation of the ns-2 Wireless Model using Simulation, Emulation, and Real Network , 2011 .

[4]  S. Liew,et al.  Throughput Analysis of IEEE 802 . 11 Multi-hop Ad hoc Networks , 2007 .

[5]  Walter Willinger,et al.  On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic , 1993, SIGCOMM '93.

[6]  Sally Floyd,et al.  Wide area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling , 1995, TNET.

[7]  J. Gordon,et al.  Pareto process as a model of self-similar packet traffic , 1995, Proceedings of GLOBECOM '95.

[8]  N.I. Sarkar,et al.  Indoor Propagation Measurements for Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11g , 2008, 2008 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference.

[9]  Krzysztof Pawlikowski,et al.  On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  Werner Wiesbeck,et al.  Measurement and simulation of radio wave propagation in hospitals , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  Throughput analysis of IEEE802.11 multi-hop ad hoc networks , 2007, TNET.

[12]  Fouad A. Tobagi,et al.  Video-conferencing and data traffic over an IEEE 802.11g WLAN using DCF and EDCA , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[13]  Bruce W. Schmeiser.  Simulation output analysis: a tutorial based on one research thread , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[14]  N.I. Sarkar,et al.  Wi-Fi Performance Measurements in the Crowded Office Environment: a Case Study , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Communication Technology.

[15]  Jon W. Mark,et al.  Wireless Communications and Networking , 2002 .

[16]  Martin Heusse,et al.  Performance anomaly of 802.11b , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).