Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation

BackgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). New techniques are necessary to improve procedural parameters like shortening of procedure duration. Real-time contact force (CF) catheters are new tools aiming to improve PVI by optimizing electrode–tissue contact and generating more effective lesions. Objective of this study was to investigate the influence on procedural parameters and clinical outcome by using a CF catheter for PVI.MethodsPVI was performed on 67 consecutive patients using a CF catheter (n = 32) or a standard ablation catheter (SAC, n = 35). Study endpoints included number of energy applications, impedance drop, fluoroscopy time, and left atrial (LA) procedure time and freedom from AF after 6 and 12 months.ResultsProcedural endpoint was reached in all patients with a similar clinical outcome (freedom from AF) in both groups 6 months (62.9 vs. 62.5 %) and 12 months post PVI (59.4 vs. 62.9 % in CF vs. SAC group, respectively). However, CF-guided ablation resulted in a greater fall of impedance (6.58 ± 0.33 vs. 9.09 ± 0.53 Ω, *** p < 0.001), lower number of energy applications (44.20 ± 3.67 vs. 34.06 ± 3.11, * p < 0.05), reduction of LA procedure time (95.52 ± 7.35 vs. 78.08 ± 7.23* min) and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy time (51.4 ± 3.3 vs. 33.0 ± 2.7*** min). In addition, a detailed analysis showed a significant correlation between quantitative impedance drop and amount of CF applied, suggesting more efficient lesion creation by CF-guided ablation.ConclusionUse of CF catheters in PVI has a beneficial effect on procedural parameters, probably by improving efficacy of transmural lesion formation.

[1]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the young: insights from the German Ablation Registry , 2013, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[2]  Aravinda Thiagalingam,et al.  Importance of Catheter Contact Force During Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model Using a Force‐Sensing Catheter , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  Helmut Pürerfellner,et al.  Clinical Impact of an Open‐Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter with Direct Force Measurement on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  H. Lambert,et al.  Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[5]  Gregory P. Walcott,et al.  Electrode Impedance: An Indicator of Electrode-Tissue Contact and Lesion Dimensions During Linear Ablation , 2000, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[6]  S. Barra,et al.  Atrial fibrillation, elevated troponin, ischemic stroke and adverse outcomes: understanding the connection , 2013, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[7]  H. Diener,et al.  Recommendations for the emergency management of complications associated with the new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban , 2013, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[8]  R. Braun-Dullaeus,et al.  Comment on the European guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation , 2011, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[9]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[10]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Adverse effects of permanent atrial fibrillation on heart failure in patients with preserved left ventricular function and chronic right apical pacing for complete heart block , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[11]  Markus Zabel,et al.  Renal artery ablation instead of pulmonary vein ablation in a hypertensive patient with symptomatic, drug-resistant, persistent atrial fibrillation , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[12]  J Clémenty,et al.  Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  David Keane,et al.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Haines,et al.  Effects of dispersive electrode position and surface area on electrical parameters and temperature during radiofrequency catheter ablation. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  J. Wöhrle,et al.  PFO closuRE and CryptogenIc StrokE (PRECISE) registry: a multi-center, international registry , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[16]  Peter Seizer,et al.  Contact force-controlled zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of right-sided and left atrial arrhythmia substrates. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[17]  E. Rummeny,et al.  A novel double cryoballoon strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation: a pilot study , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[18]  G. Steinbeck,et al.  Different Patterns of the Fall of Impedance as the Result of Heating During Ostial Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Implications for Power Titration , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  I. Akin,et al.  Long-term safety and efficacy of dual therapy with oral anticoagulation and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with drug-eluting stents , 2013, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[20]  S. Ernst,et al.  Leitlinien zur Katheterablation , 2007, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[21]  Fred H M Wittkampf,et al.  RF Catheter Ablation: Lessons on Lesions , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  T. Salukhe,et al.  Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[23]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  Biomarkers of structural remodelling and endothelial dysfunction for prediction of cardiovascular events or death in patients with atrial fibrillation , 2011, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[24]  C. Sohns,et al.  Sternal fracture after elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation , 2010, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[25]  Hendrik Lambert,et al.  Area Under the Real‐Time Contact Force Curve (Force–Time Integral) Predicts Radiofrequency Lesion Size in an In Vitro Contractile Model , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[27]  Jan Petru,et al.  Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial Treatment: Results From the EFFICAS I Study , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[28]  A. Gitt,et al.  Types and outcomes of cardioversion in patients admitted to hospital for atrial fibrillation: results of the German RHYTHM-AF Study , 2013, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[29]  Y. Okumura,et al.  A Systematical Analysis of In Vivo Contact Forces on Virtual Catheter Tip/Tissue Surface Contact during Cardiac Mapping and Intervention , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[30]  J. Wojta,et al.  Markers of oxidative stress after ablation of atrial fibrillation are associated with inflammation, delivered radiofrequency energy and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[31]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  Management of atrial fibrillation by primary care physicians in Germany: baseline results of the ATRIUM registry , 2011, Clinical Research in Cardiology.