Preface—a new paradigm for life cycle thinking: exploring sustainability in urban development scenarios

PurposeThe main goal of this special issue is to further the understanding of how to integrate life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methods and tools in the urban planning process. It is a relatively new and interdisciplinary topic that supports the integration of life cycle assessment techniques and expertise in urban planning and designing procedures such as strategic environmental assessment (SEA).MethodsStarting with life cycle thinking, the integration of the environmental life cycle assessment, and also its implementation to assess economic (life cycle costing), and social impacts (social life cycle assessment) with other planning and designing methods and tools to the urban context have been analyzed and implemented in some case studies. Examples of planning and designing methods considered are urban metabolism, strategic environmental assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis.Results and conclusionsTen contributions draw a clear picture on the current state of the art and present gaps and further developments necessary to build a complete and harmonized framework. It is evident that the variability of methodology and expertise involved in this multidisciplinary approach is very high, and that it is very important to support its further implementation to cover the current gaps. An interdisciplinary and harmonized framework and further implementation in three dimensions of sustainability are two examples of desirable future developments that were identified.

[1]  S. Valdivia,et al.  Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA , 2011 .

[2]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  The multiple dimensions of urban contexts in an industrial ecology perspective: an integrative framework , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Decision support for large-scale remediation strategies by fused urban metabolism and life cycle assessment , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Susan E. Lee,et al.  EATS: a life cycle-based decision support tool for local authorities and school caterers , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Reginald B. H. Tan,et al.  The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 , 2006 .

[6]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Life Cycle Sustainability Dashboard , 2012 .

[8]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Testing a SEA methodology for the energy sector: a waste incineration tax proposal , 2005 .

[9]  John Turnpenny,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR TOOL SELECTION AND USE IN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[11]  Haochen Hou,et al.  Life cycle assessment in urban territories: a case study of Dalian city, China , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Special issue: social LCA in progress , 2018 .

[14]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[15]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe 2016. A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Report 1: Characterization. , 2016 .

[16]  Paul Jones,et al.  Growing pacific towns and cities , 2002 .

[17]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[18]  M. Birkved,et al.  Environmental assessment of Smart City Solutions using a coupled urban metabolism—life cycle impact assessment approach , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment as an analytical tool in strategic environmental assessment. Lessons learned from a case study on municipal energy planning in Sweden , 2012 .

[20]  Aviad Shapira,et al.  Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of urban water reuse at various centralization scales , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  Martina Pini,et al.  Environmental and social impact assessment of cultural heritage restoration and its application to the Uncastillo Fortress , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[23]  Roberta Salomone,et al.  Integrating strategic environmental assessment and material flow accounting: a novel approach for moving towards sustainable urban futures , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Karen Allacker,et al.  Current trends and limitations of life cycle assessment applied to the urban scale: critical analysis and review of selected literature , 2019, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches , 2010 .

[27]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Is social life cycle assessment really struggling in development or is it on a normal path towards harmonization/standardization? , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[28]  Aiduan Li Borrion,et al.  Development of LCA Calculator to support community infrastructure co-design , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.