The Attractiveness of Enriched and Impoverished Options

The authors propose that there is a systematic impact of a person's activated self-construal (interdependent vs. independent) on the evaluation of enriched and impoverished options. This hypothesis is tested using a cross-country comparison of participants from China and the United States (Study 1) and by priming self-construal (Study 2) and regulatory focus (Study 3). Results show that people with an independent self-construal and a promotion focus perceive enriched options as more attractive than impoverished options. Conversely, people with an interdependent self-construal and a prevention focus perceive enriched options as less attractive than impoverished options. Mediation analyses show that the effect of cultural orientation operates through self-construal. In turn, self-construal operates through activated regulatory focus. Analysis of cognitive responses shows that the effect of regulatory focus is mediated by positive/negative thoughts about option attributes.

[1]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[3]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Attribute Scatter and Decision Outcome: Judgment versus Choice , 1995 .

[5]  R. Dhar.  Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[6]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[8]  N. Mandel.  Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking , 2003 .

[9]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[10]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? , 1999, Psychological review.

[11]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[12]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students , 1995 .

[13]  Rebecca W. Hamilton,et al.  Achieving Your Goals or Protecting Their Future? The Effects of Self-View on Goals and Choices , 2005 .

[14]  H. Markus,et al.  Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. , 1999 .

[15]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Comparison Effects on Preference Construction , 1999 .

[16]  D. H. Wedell,et al.  Another look at reasons for choosing and rejecting , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[18]  H. Markus,et al.  Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  R. Friedman,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Vikas Mittal,et al.  Decision Difficulty: Effects of Procedural and Outcome Accountability , 2005 .

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. , 1991 .

[23]  J S Uleman,et al.  Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion , 2001 .

[25]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .