Diagnostic Value of Manual and Computerized Methods of Dental Casts Analysis

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of computerized and manual methods of dental cast analysis. Materials and Methods: Twenty set-ups of upper and lower casts using artificial teeth corresponding to various malocclusions were created for a diagnostic in vitro study. Values of tooth size were calculated from the isolated artificial teeth out of the set-ups, results were considered as a gold standard for the tooth size. Arch width was calculated from the existing set-ups on the dentins. Impressions were taken of the casts with alginate and duplicated with dental stone. Models were measured with digital caliper manually. Then images were taken from the occlusal views of the casts by a digital camera. Measurements were done on digital images with the AutoCAD software. The results of the computerized and manual methods were compared with the gold standard. Intra class correlation coefficient of reliability was used to measure the accuracy of the methods and the Friedman technique used to evaluate the significance of differences. Results: Results indicated that all measurements were highly correlated, e.g. gold standard and manual (0.9613-0.9991), gold standard and computerized (0.7118-0.9883), manual and computerized (0.6734-0.9914). Statistically significant differences were present between these methods (P<0.05), but they proved not to be clinically significant. Conclusion: Manual measurement is still the most accurate method when compared to the computerized measurements and the results of measurement by computer should be interpreted with caution.

[1]  M. Goonewardene,et al.  Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. , 2008, Australian orthodontic journal.

[2]  N. Pitts,et al.  Determination of tooth dimensions from study casts using an image analysis system. , 1983, Journal of the International Association of Dentistry for Children.

[3]  Oded Zilberman,et al.  Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  G. Dahlberg,et al.  Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students , 1941, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[5]  M Champagne,et al.  Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. , 1992, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[6]  Hayder Abdallah Hashim,et al.  Tooth width and arch dimensions in normal and malocclusion samples: an odontometric study. , 2005, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[7]  M N Lowey,et al.  The Development of a New Method of Cephalometric and Study Cast Mensuration with a Computer Controlled, Video Image Capture System. Part II: Study Cast Mensuration , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.

[8]  T J Marcel,et al.  Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  Vittorio Cacciafesta,et al.  Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Peter Ngan,et al.  Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  S. White,et al.  Variability of study cast assessment among orthodontists. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  J. Fischer,et al.  A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  L. Walford,et al.  Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students , 1940, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[14]  Paul W Major,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  M. Muthu,et al.  Dental arch dimensions in primary dentition of children aged three to five years in Chennai and Hyderabad. , 2006, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[17]  H Rydén,et al.  The holodent system, a new technique for measurement and storage of dental casts. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  D J Halazonetis,et al.  Acquisition of 3-dimensional shapes from images. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  W. Wiltshire,et al.  Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  A H Brook,et al.  An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter , 1986, Journal of dental research.