The impact of absorptive capacity, exploration, and exploitation on individual creativity: Moderating effect of subjective well-being

Creative self-efficacy and individual knowledge influence absorptive capacity.Absorptive capacity, exploration, and exploitation influence individual creativity.We examined the moderating effects of subjective well-being (SWB).IT support has a greater effect on absorptive capacity in high SWB than low SWB.Absorptive capacity has a greater effect on creativity in high SWB than low SWB. This study proposes a new individual creativity model divided into seven main constructs: creative self-efficacy, individual knowledge, IT support, individual absorptive capacity, exploration, exploitation, and individual creativity. We assumed that creative self-efficacy, individual knowledge, and IT support positively affect individual creativity through the mediating effect of individual absorptive capacity, exploration, and exploitation. Additionally, we examined the moderating effects of subjective well-being by dividing the sample into a high subjective well-being group and a low subjective well-being group. After collecting 706 valid questionnaires from IT companies in South Korea, we applied a structural equation modeling technique to analyze the data. Empirical results reveal the following: (1) creative self-efficacy, individual knowledge, and IT support influence individual creativity through individual absorptive capacity, exploration, exploitation; and (2) subjective well-being moderates the relationship between the two constructs of the research model.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  K. Zhou,et al.  Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation , 2009 .

[3]  James B. Avey,et al.  POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION , 2007 .

[4]  R. Calantone,et al.  When Should RD&E and Marketing Collaborate? The Moderating Role of Exploration–Exploitation and Environmental Uncertainty , 2012 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[7]  L. G. Pee,et al.  Understanding the drivers, enablers, and performance of knowledge management in public organizations , 2008, ICEGOV '08.

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  Tom J. M. Mom,et al.  Investigating Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows , 2006 .

[10]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[11]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[12]  Sheng-Tsung Hou,et al.  Creative Self‐Efficacy and Innovative Behavior in a Service Setting: Optimism as a Moderator , 2011 .

[13]  Giles Hirst,et al.  A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity , 2009 .

[14]  Jeong-Yeon Lee,et al.  Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction , 2012 .

[15]  Gro Ellen Mathisen.  Organizational Antecedents of Creative Self‐Efficacy , 2011 .

[16]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being , 2002 .

[17]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[18]  Johan Kask,et al.  Asymmetrically realized absorptive capacity and relationship durability , 2012 .

[19]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[20]  K. Lee,et al.  Physiological Experiment Approach to Explore the Revelation Process for Individual Creativity Based on Exploitation and Exploration , 2011 .

[21]  T. B. Ward.  Cognition, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[22]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Explaining Differences in Societal Levels of Happiness: Relative Standards, Need Fulfillment, Culture, and Evaluation Theory , 2000 .

[23]  Petter Gottschalk.  Predictors of information technology support for inter‐organizational knowledge management: lessons learned from law firms in Norway , 2001 .

[24]  Eric Chong,et al.  The Influence of Individual Factors, Supervision and Work Environment on Creative Self-Efficacy , 2010 .

[25]  Elena Revilla,et al.  Managing the knowledge paradox in product development , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Carmen Weigelt,et al.  Performance implications of outsourcing for technological innovations: managing the efficiency and adaptability trade‐off , 2012 .

[28]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[29]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[30]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Mei Cao,et al.  Exploring the absorptive capacity to innovation/productivity link for individual engineers engaged in IT enabled work , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. , 1994 .

[33]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Technology Dominance in Complex Decision Making: The Case of Aided Credibility Assessment , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Innovation Impacts of Using Social Bookmarking Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[35]  B. Rodrigo-Moya,et al.  Learning Culture as a Mediator of the Influence of an Individual's Knowledge on Market Orientation , 2007 .

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  C. Keyes,et al.  The structure of psychological well-being revisited , 1995 .

[38]  Henrikki Tikkanen,et al.  Exploration and exploitation across three resource classes : market / customer intelligence , brands / bonds , and technologies / processes , 2009 .

[39]  R. Dybdahl,et al.  The possible benefits of difficulty: how stress can increase and decrease subjective well-being. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[40]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[41]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[42]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Learning by foraging: The impact of individual knowledge and social tags on web navigation processes , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[44]  J. George,et al.  When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice , 2001 .

[45]  C. Ryff.  Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. , 1989 .

[46]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Relational Benefits of Improved Interfirm Information Processing Capability in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2013, MIS Q..

[47]  Jenny Darroch,et al.  Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practices , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[48]  R. Burns,et al.  Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples , 2009 .

[49]  Cristina Ponsiglione,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation in complex environments , 2012 .

[50]  Murugan Anandarajan,et al.  Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  A. Tumasjan,et al.  Be yourself, believe in yourself, and be happy: self-efficacy as a mediator between personality factors and subjective well-being. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[52]  Herman Wold,et al.  Soft modelling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions , 1982 .

[53]  Demola Obembe,et al.  Understanding individual action: when employees contravene management directives to foster knowledge sharing , 2010 .

[54]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale , 2001 .

[56]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  David S. Preston,et al.  Antecedents and Effects of CIO Supply-Side and Demand-Side Leadership: A Staged Maturity Model , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Liping Xu,et al.  Subjective Well-being Poverty of the Elderly Population in China , 2011 .

[59]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investments on Downside Risk of the Firm: Alternative Measurement of the Business Value of IT , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  D. Cottrell,et al.  Well-Being Under Chronic Stress: Is Morningness an Advantage? , 2010 .

[61]  Examining Gender with General Creativity and Preferences for Creative Persons in College Students within the Sciences and the Arts , 2008 .

[62]  Jing Zhou,et al.  When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Assessing Between-Group Differences in Information Systems Research: A Comparison of Covariance-and Component-Based SEM , 2009, MIS Q..

[64]  J. Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation of knowledge through an unlearning context , 2011 .

[65]  M. Salanova,et al.  Information technology implementation styles and their relation with workers’ subjective well‐being , 2004 .

[66]  Ci-Rong Li,et al.  Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development , 2011 .

[67]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[68]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[69]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[70]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[71]  Piers Steel,et al.  Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  Jeffery D. Houghton.  Leadership development: the key to unlocking individual creativity in organizations , 2010 .

[73]  A. Leung,et al.  The relations between life domain satisfaction and subjective well‐being , 2011 .

[74]  L. S. Ganesh,et al.  Inter‐individual knowledge transfer and performance in product development , 2011 .

[75]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[76]  C. Ford.  A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[77]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[78]  Markus Baer.  Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations , 2012 .

[79]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[80]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[81]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[82]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[83]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..