Recall and detection rates in screening mammography

The authors investigated the correlation between recall and detection rates in a group of 10 radiologists who had read a high volume of screening mammograms in an academic institution.

[1]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[2]  Melanie Pinet,et al.  Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  H. Welch,et al.  US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. , 2000, BMJ.

[4]  D B Kopans,et al.  The accuracy of mammographic interpretation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Wolverton,et al.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography , 2003, Journal of general internal medicine.

[7]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  J. Elmore,et al.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Eisenberg.  Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1999, Medical care.

[12]  M Moskowitz.  Retrospective reviews of breast cancer screening: what do we really learn from them? , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  M. Linver.  Audits measure practice quality of mammography. , 2000, Diagnostic imaging.

[14]  E A Sickles,et al.  Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  E. Sickles.  Successful methods to reduce false-positive mammography interpretations. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[17]  M J Schell,et al.  Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. Santed,et al.  Adverse psychological effects in women attending a second-stage breast cancer screening. , 2002, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[19]  R. Smith,et al.  The mammography audit: a primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA). , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  E. Burnside,et al.  The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. , 2001, Clinical breast cancer.

[21]  S. Feig.  Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success. , 2000, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  J Austoker,et al.  Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.