The new International Staging System for Lung Cancer.

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer provides for classification of six levels of disease extent in five stage groups that relate to patient management and prognosis. Stage 0 is reserved for patients with carcinoma in situ. The Stage I and II definitions provide for classification of two levels of disease extent completely contained within the lung that have different prognostic and therapeutic implications. Definitive resection is the first choice of therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in these stage groups. The Stage II category takes into account the erosion of survival expectations in the optimum group of T1 and T2 patients as a consequence of intrapulmonary lymph node involvement. Although small cell carcinoma is infrequently encountered as Stage I and Stage II disease, these classifications may be useful in the structure of investigational programs involving adjuvant surgery. The exclusion of distant metastases and the division of Stage III into two levels of extrapulmonary disease allow for selection of patients for specific treatment plans. Patients with non-small cell tumors with Stage IIIa disease usually are candidates for definitive surgical treatment. The specificity of the T and N definitions in the Stage IIIa and IIIb categories identifies patients for whom particular radiotherapy treatment plans are structured and protocol assignments are made. It is consistent with patient management concepts that all those with distant metastases are classified as having Stage IV disease. Implications of the system for selection of surgical, radiotherapeutic, and chemotherapeutic regimens are rational for all cell types. The classification meets the requirement for simplicity and can be readily applied in a broad spectrum of clinical and teaching environments. It is, however, sufficiently specific to be useful for reporting results of investigational therapies. Prospective use of the classification should encourage precision in clinical evaluations that exploit full use of refinements in imaging technologies. The cooperative efforts of the Task Force on Lung of the AJCC and the TNM Committees of the UICC to bring this classification system to fruition and international acceptance have been described. It has been adopted by these groups and others, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the Japanese Cancer Committee, and the Spanish Society of Respiratory Disease, as their official recommendation for staging lung cancer.

[1]  R. Ginsberg,et al.  The value of adjuvant radiotherapy in pulmonary and chest wall resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  K. Yoshimura A clinical statistical study of lung cancer patients in Japan with special reference to the staging system of TNM classification: a report from the Japan Joint Committee of Lung Cancer associated with the TNM System of Clinical Classification (UICC). , 1983, Radiation Medicine.

[3]  T. Naruke,et al.  Lymph node mapping and curability at various levels of metastasis in resected lung cancer. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Bonny R. Hart,et al.  Prognostic significance of N1 disease in carcinoma of the lung. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  J. Deslauriers,et al.  Tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy for carcinomas of the proximal left main bronchus. , 1984, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[6]  J. Cox,et al.  Radiotherapeutic management of complications of carcinoma of the lung. , 1982, Clinics in Chest Medicine.

[7]  M. Gail,et al.  Surgical adjuvant intrapleural BCG treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Preliminary report of the National Cancer Institute Lung Cancer Study Group. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  P. Pairolero,et al.  Bronchogenic carcinoma with chest wall invasion: factors affecting survival following en bloc resection. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Elisa T. Lee,et al.  A computer program for comparing K samples with right-censored data. , 1972, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[10]  C. Mountain,et al.  A system for the clinical staging of lung cancer. , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[11]  S. Ishikawa Staging System on TNM Classification for Lung Cancer , 1973 .

[12]  J. Minna,et al.  Advances in small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. , 1977, Cancer treatment reports.

[13]  M. Melamed,et al.  Detection of true pathologic stage I lung cancer in a screening program and the effect on survival , 1981, Cancer.

[14]  C. Mountain The biological operability of stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  A computer program for estimating survival functions from the life table , 1970 .

[16]  W F Taylor,et al.  Survival of patients surgically treated for stage I lung cancer. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  D. Carr The staging of lung cancer. , 1974, American Review of Respiratory Disease.

[18]  N. Martini,et al.  Results of resection in non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung with mediastinal lymph node metastases. , 1983, Annals of surgery.