A comparative study of floor construction on sloping sites: an analysis of cumulative energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions

In order to make environmentally aware decisions, there is growing interest in the comparative energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) performance of competing construction methods. Little research has been done concerning competing ground floor construction methods, especially given different site variables, such as slope and soil type. A life cycle assessment approach was adopted to analyse environmental impacts, including cumulative energy demand and GHG emissions for detached housing construction in Australia. Data was drawn from 24 case study housing projects, including 12 reinforced concrete and 12 suspended timber floor projects. The data presented in the paper compares cumulative energy demand, GHG and the constituent parts of competing construction methods. The findings indicate that the timber floors use/create significantly less cumulative energy demand and GHG emissions than concrete floors—approximately 2.1 to 2.7 times less energy and 2.3 to 2.9 times less GHG. These findings are limited to the site slope and foundation soil types identified in the paper. The main application of the work is in guidance concerning the lowest environmental impact options for detached housing construction.

[1]  Perry Forsythe,et al.  Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings , 2013 .

[2]  Timothy A. G. Langrish,et al.  Wood versus concrete and steel in house construction a life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[3]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[4]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[5]  Pekka E. Kauppi,et al.  Technological and Economic Potential of Options to Enhance , Maintain , and Manage Biological Carbon Reservoirs and Geoengineering , 2022 .

[6]  L. Price,et al.  CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM THE GLOBAL CEMENT INDUSTRY , 2001 .

[7]  A. Carre,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of alternative constructions of a typical Australian house design , 2011 .

[8]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  CORRIM: Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials , 2004 .

[9]  David G. Carmichael,et al.  A review of building/infrastructure sustainability reporting tools (SRTs) , 2013 .

[10]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Teresa Gallego,et al.  Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors , 2009 .

[12]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[13]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  The Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction , 2007 .

[14]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[15]  R. Venterea.  Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change , 2009 .

[16]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[17]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[18]  Maureen E. Puettmann,et al.  LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF WOOD PRODUCTS: CRADLE-TO-GATE LCI OF RESIDENTIAL WOOD BUILDING MATERIALS , 2005 .

[19]  Linda S. Heath,et al.  The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States , 2008 .

[20]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions , 1999 .

[21]  R. Sathre,et al.  Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution , 2010 .

[22]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[23]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Multi-storey timber buildings: breaking industry path dependency , 2008 .

[24]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes , 2010 .

[26]  Gloria P. Gerilla,et al.  An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction , 2007 .

[27]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .