A Prospective Study of Psychoanalytic Practice and Professional Development

In 2003 the Columbia Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research began a prospective study of graduates designed to both describe and understand their professional trajectory. The study has two components: a quantitative component based on an anonymous comprehensive questionnaire given analysts yearly starting with their graduation, and a qualitative component comprising analyst interviews beginning at the end of the first postgraduate year and repeated every two years. Analysis of the first six years of the qualitative study shows that analysts will talk openly about their practice and careers and that when they do, practical issues are a dominant concern. Analysts both immersed and not immersed in four-times-weekly analytic cases experiment with adapting skills developed in training to treat cases in analysis seen less frequently. Analysts without four-times-weekly case immersion are engaged in analytic careers, participate as faculty at the institute, and report a high degree of career satisfaction. The major findings of this study compel changes in psychoanalytic training programs. The field would do well to address actual clinical practice experience in institute curricula and training programs, thus making analytic training more relevant.

[1]  Jane G Tillman,et al.  Mixed Methods Research Design for Pragmatic Psychoanalytic Studies , 2011, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[2]  S. Cherry,et al.  A Prospective Study of Career Development and Analytic Practice: the First Five Years , 2009, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[3]  T. Ogden,et al.  On becoming a psychoanalyst , 2009, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[4]  R. Wille Psychoanalytic Identity: Psychoanalysis as an Internal Object , 2008, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.

[5]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[6]  M. Parsons The analyst’s countertransference to the psychoanalytic process , 2006, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[7]  L. Ehrlich The analyst's reluctance to begin a new analysis. , 2004, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[8]  S. Cherry,et al.  Psychoanalytic Practice in the Early Postgraduate Years , 2004, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[9]  Laurence Spurling On psychoanalytic figures as transference objects , 2003, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[10]  Heather Craige Mourning Analysis: The Post-Termination Phase , 2002, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[11]  H. F. Smith,et al.  Hearing Voices: the Fate of the Analyst's iDentifications , 2001, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[12]  S. Roose,et al.  The Columbia Supervision Project: Data From the Dyad , 2001, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[13]  A. Skolnikoff Seeking an Analytic Identity , 2000 .

[14]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The definition and assessment of analytic process: can analysts agree? , 1997, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[15]  S. Rosenbloom The development of the work ego in the beginning analyst: thoughts on identity formation of the psychoanalyst. , 1992, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[16]  R. Glick,et al.  The analyst's postgraduate development--rereading Freud and working theory through. , 1991, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.