Synchrony: quantifying variability in space and time

Summary There is growing recognition that linking patterns to their underlying processes in interconnected and dynamic ecological systems requires data sampled at multiple spatial and temporal scales. However, spatially explicit and temporally resolved data sets can be difficult to analyze using classical statistical methods because the data are typically autocorrelated and thus violate the assumption of independence. Here, we describe the synchrony package for the R programming environment, which provides modern parametric and nonparametric methods for (i) quantifying temporal and spatial patterns of auto- and cross-correlated variability in univariate, bivariate, and multivariate data sets, and (ii) assessing their statistical significance via Monte Carlo randomizations. We illustrate how the methods included in the package can be used to investigate the causes of spatial and temporal variability in ecological systems through a series of examples, and discuss the assumptions and caveats of each statistical procedure in order to provide a practical guide for their application in the real world.

[1]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  A LATITUDINAL GRADIENT IN RECRUITMENT OF INTERTIDAL INVERTEBRATES IN THE NORTHEAST PACIFIC OCEAN , 2001 .

[2]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[3]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[5]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlation and partial mantel tests , 2000 .

[6]  M. Loreau,et al.  Species Synchrony and Its Drivers: Neutral and Nonneutral Community Dynamics in Fluctuating Environments , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Coastal oceanography sets the pace of rocky intertidal community dynamics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[9]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  DISSECTING THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF ECOLOGICAL DATA AT MULTIPLE SCALES , 2004 .

[10]  Bernard Cazelles,et al.  Symbolic dynamics for identifying similarity between rhythms of ecological time series , 2004 .

[11]  F. Guichard,et al.  Local disturbance cycles and the maintenance of heterogeneity across scales in marine metapopulations. , 2007, Ecology.

[12]  Scott R. Evans,et al.  MEASURING AND TESTING FOR SPATIAL SYNCHRONY , 2001 .

[13]  P. Legendre.  Species associations: the Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited , 2005 .

[14]  E. Post,et al.  Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate , 2002, Nature.

[15]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Anisotropic patterned population synchrony in climatic gradients indicates nonlinear climatic forcing , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis , 2012 .

[17]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Fine‐scale spatial structure in a grassland community: quantifying the plant’s‐eye view , 2002 .

[18]  J. Fox,et al.  Environmental fluctuations can stabilize food web dynamics by increasing synchrony. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[19]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[20]  Frédéric Guichard,et al.  Synchrony and Stability of Food Webs in Metacommunities , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  SPECIES INTERACTION STRENGTH: TESTING MODEL PREDICTIONS ALONG AN UPWELLING GRADIENT , 2004 .

[22]  R D Stevens,et al.  Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Holt,et al.  Meta‐ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology , 2003 .

[24]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists 1st edition , 2005 .

[25]  B. Hugueny,et al.  Spatial synchrony in population dynamics of West African fishes: a demonstration of an intraspecific and interspecific Moran effect , 2004 .

[26]  F. Guichard,et al.  Ecological processes can synchronize marine population dynamics over continental scales , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[28]  Environmental colour intensifies the Moran effect when population dynamics are spatially heterogeneous , 2007 .

[29]  R. Ricklefs.  Disintegration of the Ecological Community , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems , 1999, Nature.

[31]  Bernard Cazelles,et al.  Detection of imperfect population synchrony in an uncertain world , 2003 .

[32]  W. Falck,et al.  Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: Estimation and testing , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  David J. Mulla,et al.  Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence , 1992 .