Shared-control brain-computer interface for a two dimensional reaching task using EEG error-related potentials

One of the main problems of EEG-based brain computer interfaces (BCIs) is their low information rate, thus for complex tasks the user needs large amounts of time to solve the task. In an attempt to reduce this time and improve the application robustness, recent works have explored shared-control strategies where the device does not only execute the decoded commands, but it is also involved in executing the task. This work proposes a shared-control BCI using error potentials for a 2D reaching task with discrete actions and states. The proposed system has several interesting properties: the system is scalable without increasing the complexity of the user's mental task; the interaction is natural for the user, as the mental task is to monitor the device performance to promote its task learning (in this context the reaching task); and the system has the potential to be combined with additional brain signals to recover or learn from interaction errors. Online control experiments were performed with four subjects, showing that it was possible to reach a goal location from any starting point within a 5×5 grid in around 23 actions (about 19 seconds of EEG signal), both with fixed goals and goals freely chosen by the users.

[1]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  H. Flor,et al.  The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  S. Senthilkumar,et al.  Brain-Controlled Telepresence Robot By Motor-Disabled People , 2013 .

[4]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  A Noninvasive Brain-Actuated Wheelchair Based on a P300 Neurophysiological Protocol and Automated Navigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  M. Nuttin,et al.  A brain-actuated wheelchair: Asynchronous and non-invasive Brain–computer interfaces for continuous control of robots , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[7]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Toward Unsupervised Adaptation of LDA for Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R Chavarriaga,et al.  Learning From EEG Error-Related Potentials in Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Barry,et al.  EOG correction of blinks with saccade coefficients: a test and revision of the aligned-artefact average solution , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Noninvasive brain-actuated control of a mobile robot by human EEG , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[14]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Latency correction of error potentials between different experiments reduces calibration time for single-trial classification , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Javier Minguez,et al.  A Telepresence Mobile Robot Controlled With a Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interface , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[16]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Error-Related EEG Potentials Generated During Simulated Brain–Computer Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  I Iturrate,et al.  Task-dependent signal variations in EEG error-related potentials for brain–computer interfaces , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  Robot reinforcement learning using EEG-based reward signals , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.