Examining Tactical Information Technology — Business Alignment

The goal of strategic IT-business alignment has been to deploy IT applications that support business strategy. In spite of voluminous “strategic” IT plans and numerous studies on strategic IT-business alignment, accounts of wasted IT investments and deployment of business-irrelevant applications are rampant, indicating lack of alignment at the tactical level, that is, lack of execution-level processes addressing issues of resources, objectives and implementation-priority matching, between IT and the business. We answer the question: What are the aspects and outcomes of tactical IT-business alignment? We (1) identify six aspects of tactical IT-business alignment, and (2) show how they lead to four outcomes — implementation of planned applications, execution of IT-enabled aspects of business strategy, increased credibility of the IT function and increased business value from IT projects. Our results are based on qualitative primary data (45 hours of interviews with 28 IT and functional managers and company documents) from four organizations.

[1]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[3]  Earl Management Strategy for Information Technology , 1997 .

[4]  A. McAfee Mastering the three worlds of information technology , 2006 .

[5]  Andrew McAfee Do You Have Too Much IT , 2004 .

[6]  Narayan S. Umanath The concept of contingency beyond "It depends": illustrations from IS research stream , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[7]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[8]  Arpan Jani,et al.  An experimental investigation of factors influencing perceived control over a failing IT project , 2008 .

[9]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Project Management in the Information Systems and Information Technologies Industries , 2002 .

[12]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Linda Sl Lai,et al.  A synergistic approach to project management in information systems development , 1997 .

[14]  Andrew P. McAfee When Too Much IT Knowledge Is a Dangerous Thing , 2003 .

[15]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000, MIS Q..

[16]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Managerial IT unconsciousness , 2006, CACM.

[17]  William R. King,et al.  Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[18]  S. Zahra,et al.  Integrating the Content and Process of Strategic MIS Planning with Competitive Strategy , 1991 .

[19]  Yolande E. Chan Why Haven't We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organization Structure , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  Yael Grushka-Cockayne,et al.  The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects , 2005 .

[22]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Information systems project management: an agency theory interpretation , 2003, J. Syst. Softw..

[23]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Bridging the gap between the IS organization and the rest of the business: plotting a route , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  M. Jeffery,et al.  Best Practices in IT Portfolio Management , 2004 .

[25]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..