Standards harmonization: theory and practice

As software engineering (and other) standards are developed over a period of years or decades, the suite of standards thus developed often begins to lose any cohesion that it originally possessed. This has led to discussions in the standards communities of possible collaborative development, interoperability and harmonization of their existing standards. Here, I assess how such harmonization efforts may be aided by recent research results to create better quality standards to replace the status quo.

[1]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Formalization of the Whole-Part Relationship in the Unified Modeling Language , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[2]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Situational Method Engineering: State-of-the-Art Review , 2010, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A Method Assessment Framework , 2011, ME.

[4]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[5]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A Metamodel for Assessable Software Development Methodologies , 2005, Software Quality Journal.

[6]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  The open process framework : an introduction , 2002 .

[7]  Keng Siau,et al.  Unified Modeling Language: A Complexity Analysis , 2001, J. Database Manag..

[8]  Heinrich C. Mayr,et al.  Information systems technology and its applications , 2003 .

[9]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A powertype-based metamodelling framework , 2006, Software & Systems Modeling.

[10]  Jean-Marc Jézéquel,et al.  Meta-model Pruning , 2009, MoDELS.

[11]  José Rose,et al.  Software quality engineering in the new ISO standard: ISO/IEC 24748 - systems and software engineering --- guide for life cycle management , 2010, C3S2E '10.

[12]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Granularity in Conceptual Modelling: Application to Metamodels , 2010, ER.

[13]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  An Ontology for Software Development Methodologies and Endeavours , 2006, Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology.

[14]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics , 2000, ICCS.

[15]  James Odell,et al.  Power Types , 1994, J. Object Oriented Program..

[16]  C. Hamilton Requiem for a species: why we resist the truth about climate change. , 2010 .

[17]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Method Engineering: Theory and Practice , 2006, ISTA.

[18]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Keynote: On the Ease of Extending a Powertype-Based Methodology Metamodel , 2006, WoMM.

[19]  The future of the world's climate , 2012 .

[20]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  UML – the Good, the Bad or the Ugly? Perspectives from a panel of experts , 2005, Software & Systems Modeling.

[21]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Exploring the Concept of Method Rationale: A Conceptual Tool to Understand Method Tailoring , 2006 .

[22]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[23]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UMLFamily of Diagrams , 2009, SLE.