Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use : Social and metacognitive influences

Social and metacognitive contributors to gender differences in 1st grader's mathematics strategy use were explored. Fifty-eight children solved addition and subtraction problems individually and in groups of 3 in October, January, and May. The children's strategy use was assessed individually, as well as their metacognitive knowledge for mathematics strategies and their rationales for the use of different mathematics strategies. The children also solved addition and subtraction problems in groups. Gender differences were found: Girls were more likely to count on fingers or use counters (overt strategies); boys were more likely to use retrieval (from memory) to solve addition and subtraction problems. All children were less likely to use overt strategies and more likely to use covert strategies and retrieval in the group session. Metacognition was a significant predictor of strategy use. Social rationales for strategy use emerged at the end of the year.

[1]  Sandra P. Marshall,et al.  Sex differences in children's mathematics achievement: Solving computations and story problems. , 1984 .

[2]  R. Siegler Hazards of mental chronometry: An example from children's subtraction. , 1989 .

[3]  M. Carr,et al.  Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of mathematics strategy use , 1995 .

[4]  R. Butler,et al.  Mastery versus ability appraisal: a developmental study of children's observations of peers' work. , 1989, Child development.

[5]  P. Peterson,et al.  2 – Autonomous Learning Behavior: A Possible Explanation of Gender-Related Differences in Mathematics , 1985 .

[6]  D. Ruble,et al.  What children say when the teacher is not around: conflicting goals in social comparison and performance assessment in the classroom. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematics , 1985 .

[8]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Mathematics Learning and the Sexes: A Review. , 1974 .

[9]  Louise Cherry Wilkinson,et al.  9 – Sex Differences and Sex Segregation in Students' Small-Group Communication* , 1985 .

[10]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Elaborative and Integrative Thought Processes in Mathematics Learning. , 1988 .

[11]  Joe Garofalo,et al.  Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. , 1985 .

[12]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Learning What's Taught: Sex Differences in Instruction. , 1979 .

[13]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  Children's preferences for individualistic, cooperative, and competitive outcomes. , 1976 .

[14]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Robert E. Reys,et al.  Mathematical Competencies of Entering Kindergarteners. , 1970 .

[16]  David C. Geary,et al.  Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition , 1995 .

[17]  D. Mcguinness Behavioral tempo in pre-school boys and girls , 1990 .

[18]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Annals of Child Development , 1995 .

[19]  M. Kimball A new perspective on women's math achievement. , 1989 .

[20]  L. Wilkinson,et al.  Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction , 1985 .

[21]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[22]  L. Lowery,et al.  Socio‐economic status and sex differences in visual resemblance sorting tasks at the first grade level , 1970 .

[23]  P. Peterson,et al.  Teacher-student interactions and sex-related differences in learning mathematics , 1986 .

[24]  M. Carr,et al.  Metacognition and mathematics strategy use , 1994 .

[25]  Richard De Lisi,et al.  Gender differences in Scholastic Aptitude Test: Mathematics problem solving among high-ability students. , 1994 .

[26]  H. S. Waters,et al.  Sex differences in elaborative strategies: a developmental analysis. , 1991, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  Jane M. Armstrong,et al.  Achievement and Participation of Women in Mathematics: Results of Two National Surveys. , 1981 .

[28]  Sex-Related Differences in High School Science and Mathematics Enrollments: Do They Give Males a Critical Headstart Toward Science- and Math-Related Careers?. , 1983 .

[29]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. , 1990 .

[30]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  Classroom contextual effects on children's play. , 1989 .

[31]  Karin S. Frey,et al.  What children say about classroom performance: sex and grade differences in perceived competence. , 1987, Child development.

[32]  Patricia Howlin,et al.  Origins of cognitive skills , 1986 .

[33]  S. Harter Mastery motivation and the need for approval in older children and their relationship to social desirability response tendencies. , 1975 .

[34]  R S Siegler Individual differences in strategy choices: good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists. , 1988, Child development.

[35]  J. Brophy Teacher influences on student achievement. , 1986 .

[36]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation , 1983 .

[37]  D. Kuhn Strategies of Knowledge Acquisition , 1995 .

[38]  H. S. Waters Organizational strategies in memory for prose: A developmental analysis , 1981 .

[39]  S. Marshall,et al.  Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. , 1987 .

[40]  Randall I. Charles,et al.  An evaluation of a process-oriented instructional program in mathematical problem solving in Grades 5 and 7. , 1984 .

[41]  Gilah C. Leder,et al.  Mathematics and Gender , 2021, The Joy of Mathematics.