Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Experiments are reported that assessed the ability of people, without vision, to locate the positions of objects from imagined points of observation that are related to their actual position by rotational or translational components. Theoretical issues addressed were whether spatial relations stored in an object-to-object system are directly retrieved or whether retrieval is mediated by a body-centered coordinate system, and whether body-centered access involves a process of imaging updating of self-position. The results, with those of Rieser (1989), indicate that in the case of regularly structured object arrays, interobject relations are directly retrieved for the translation task, but for the rotation task, retrieval occurs by means of a body-centered coordinate system, requiring imagined body rotation. For irregularly structured arrays, access of interobject spatial structure occurs by means of a body-centered coordinate system for both translation and rotation tasks, requiring imagined body translation or rotation. Array regularity affected retrieval of spatial structure in terms of global shape of interobject relations and local object position within global shape.

[1]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[2]  B. Poucet Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. , 1993, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[4]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Reference points in spatial cognition. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[6]  D. Zipser,et al.  Biologically plausible models of place recognition and goal location , 1986 .

[7]  J. Rieser Access to Knowledge of Spatial Structure at Novel Points of Observation , 1989 .

[8]  R H Day,et al.  Spatial localization in infancy: position constancy in a square and circular room with and without a landmark. , 1986, Child development.

[9]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[10]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Paillard Motor and representational framing of space , 1991 .

[13]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  L. Acredolo,et al.  Early Development of Spatial Orientation in Humans , 1987 .

[15]  Sholl Mj Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. , 1987 .

[16]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[17]  J. Paillard Brain and space , 1991 .

[18]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[20]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Orientation in cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.