Policy Mixes, Policy Interplay and Low Carbon Transitions: The Case of Passenger Transport in Finland

The promotion of low-carbon transport systems is largely dependent on the interplay between technology, innovation, markets, people's behaviour and policy. Various policies jointly influence the development of transport systems, some policies implying different or even contradictory designs for future transport systems. Policy interplay has not been much addressed in previous research on sustainability transitions. This article combines the technological innovation system (TIS) functions, within the transitions framework, with policy analysis to empirically map multiple policies and their intended paths towards low-carbon transport systems. Empirically, the article provides a systematic review of Finnish national-level policies for transport and transport-related innovation. The discussion examines the contribution of the current policy mix to sustainability transitions based on its degree of attempt to re-design the transport system. The findings reveal that policy support is more comprehensive regarding more energy-efficient vehicles and low-carbon fuels than based on reduced transport demand or alternative transport modes. A holistic policy approach towards low-carbon transitions is only achieved to a degree and innovation policy gaps are identified

[1]  Peter M. Rudberg,et al.  Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU , 2012 .

[2]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Transport policy and environmental impacts: The importance of multi-instrumentality in policy integration , 2007 .

[3]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Public policy as a part of transforming energy systems: framing bioenergy in Finnish energy policy , 2011 .

[4]  A. Teytelboym,et al.  Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport , 2010 .

[5]  P. Goodwin.  Transformation of transport policy in Great Britain , 1999 .

[6]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Path dependence and technological expectations in transport policy: the case of Finland and the UK , 2013 .

[7]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[8]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[9]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[10]  J. Voss,et al.  Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors , 2008 .

[11]  Daniel Z. Meyer,et al.  Excel as a Qualitative Data Analysis Tool , 2009 .

[12]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Abigail L. Bristow,et al.  Developing pathways to low carbon land-based passenger transport in Great Britain by 2050 , 2008 .

[14]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[15]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen automobiles , 2010 .

[16]  C. Jemelin,et al.  Socio-political analysis of French transport policies: The state of the practices , 2008 .

[17]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  The challenge of greening technologies—Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies , 2006 .

[18]  A. Decrop.  Triangulation in qualitative tourism research , 1999 .

[19]  Anique Hommels,et al.  Policy Change and Policy Incoherence: The Case of Competition Versus Public Safety in Standardization Policies , 2013 .

[20]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[21]  J. Anable,et al.  Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review , 2011 .

[22]  Toni Ahlqvist,et al.  Is the transport system becoming ubiquitous? Socio-technical roadmapping as a tool for integrating the development of transport policies and intelligent transport systems and services in Finland , 2010 .

[23]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[24]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies , 2012 .

[25]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Biofuel developments in Sweden and the Netherlands : protection and socio-technical change in a long-term perspective , 2009 .

[26]  Maïder Saint Jean,et al.  Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry , 2009 .

[27]  D. Ockwell,et al.  The role of discourse and linguistic framing effects in sustaining high carbon energy policy--An accessible introduction , 2010 .

[28]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[29]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Exploring technology paths: The development of alternative transport fuels in Sweden 2005-2020 , 2008 .

[30]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[31]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[32]  S. Monni,et al.  Multilevel climate policy: the case of the European Union, Finland and Helsinki. , 2008 .

[33]  Peter J. May,et al.  Policy coherence and policy domains , 2006 .

[34]  Rob P. J. M. Raven,et al.  Multi-Regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power Technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000 , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[35]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[36]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review , 2010 .

[37]  R. Kemp,et al.  Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? , 2009 .

[38]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden , 2008 .

[39]  J. Rayner,et al.  Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’ , 2007 .

[40]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  The innovation effects of environmental policies : linking policies, companies and innovations in the Nordic pulp and paper industry , 2008 .

[41]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel , 2010 .