Visual search.

Visual search is the act of looking for a predefined target among other objects. This task has been widely used as an experimental paradigm to study visual attention, and because of its influence has also become a subject of research itself. When used as a paradigm, visual search studies address questions including the nature, function, and limits of preattentive processing and focused attention. As a subject of research, visual search studies address the role of memory in search, the procedures involved in search, and factors that affect search performance. In this article, we review major theories of visual search, the ways in which preattentive information is used to guide attentional allocation, the role of memory, and the processes and decisions involved in its successful completion. We conclude by summarizing the current state of knowledge about visual search and highlight some unresolved issues. WIREs Cogn Sci 2013, 4:415-429. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1235 The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

[1]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[2]  Michael Zehetleitner,et al.  Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[4]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Zeki.  The functional organization of projections from striate to prestriate visual cortex in the rhesus monkey. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[7]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Stimulus-driven capture and contingent capture. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[8]  R. Rosenholtz,et al.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[9]  Ashley M. Sherman,et al.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Hermann J. Miiller,et al.  Probing Distractor Inhibition in Visual Search: Inhibition of Return , 2000 .

[11]  H. Müller,et al.  Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: A common salience route for detection and compound tasks , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[15]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Word cues affect detection but not localization responses , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  T Kumada,et al.  Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R. Marois,et al.  The attentional blink: A review of data and theory , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Evan M. Palmer,et al.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search , 2010, Vision Research.

[20]  Johan Hulleman,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Eye Movements Reveal how Task Difficulty Moulds Visual Search , 2012 .

[21]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[22]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: evidence from selective search. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Johan Hulleman,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: Only in difficult search are items tagged individually , 2010, Vision Research.

[24]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Louis K. H. Chan,et al.  Dimension-specific signal modulation in visual search: evidence from inter-stimulus surround suppression. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[30]  Louis K. H. Chan,et al.  Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  G. Zelinsky.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[32]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[34]  H. Nothdurft.  The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[35]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Searching through the hierarchy: How level of target categorization affects visual search , 2012, Visual cognition.

[36]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[37]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[38]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  R. Rosenholtz.  Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .

[45]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Dimension‐specific intertrial facilitation in visual search for pop‐out targets: Evidence for a top‐down modulable visual short‐term memory effect , 2004 .

[46]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[47]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: using time in visual selection , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  T Kumada,et al.  Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  H. Egeth,et al.  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search? , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  It’s under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  K. Cave,et al.  Flexibility in Spatial Attention Before and After Practice , 1997 .

[58]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[62]  J. Palmer.  Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[63]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  In Search of Remembrance: Evidence for Memory in Visual Search , 2000, Psychological science.

[65]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[67]  How to keep attention from straying: Get engaged! , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[68]  H. Nothdurft.  Focal attention in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[69]  J. Henderson,et al.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Ronald A. Rensink.  The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[71]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[72]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Attention is fast but volition is slow , 2000, Nature.

[73]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[75]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  A Dissociation Between Attention and Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[76]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[77]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[78]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[79]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[80]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Attentional guidance in singleton search: An examination of top-down, bottom-up, and intertrial factors , 2008 .

[83]  Hany Farid,et al.  The specificity of the search template. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[84]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form-conjunction targets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  W. Prinzmetal,et al.  Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: The effect of perceptual difficulty , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[86]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[87]  J. Wolfe.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[88]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[89]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[90]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[92]  A. Yagi,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[93]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  When does visual attention select all features of a distractor? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[94]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  Angela M. Brown,et al.  Color Channels, Not Color Appearance or Color Categories, Guide Visual Search for Desaturated Color Targets , 2010, Psychological science.

[96]  P. Malinowski,et al.  How to produce an absent-advantage in visual search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[97]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[98]  Naomi M. Kenner,et al.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[99]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[100]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[101]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Varying Target Prevalence Reveals Two Dissociable Decision Criteria in Visual Search , 2010, Current Biology.

[102]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.