论文信息 - The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences? - 字舞流文

The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences?

A. T. Smith | D. Jeffreys | A.T Smith

[1] H. P. Meles,et al. Average multichannel EEG potential fields evoked from upper and lower hemi-retina: latency differences. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2] A M Halliday,et al. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. , 1977, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3] C. Shagass,et al. Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuli. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4] A M Halliday,et al. Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man. , 1971, Brain research.

[5] D. Jeffreys,et al. Cortical Source Locations of Pattern-related Visual Evoked Potentials recorded from the Human Scalp , 1971, Nature.

[6] A M Halliday,et al. Changes in pattern‐evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field , 1970, The Journal of physiology.